<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Post4VPS Forum | Free VPS Provider - World Science & Technology]]></title>
		<link>https://post4vps.com/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Post4VPS Forum | Free VPS Provider - https://post4vps.com]]></description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 14:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>MyBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Why aren't Governments putting a stop to the overpopulation of the world?]]></title>
			<link>https://post4vps.com/Thread-Why-aren-t-Governments-putting-a-stop-to-the-overpopulation-of-the-world</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2020 13:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://post4vps.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=917">deanhills</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://post4vps.com/Thread-Why-aren-t-Governments-putting-a-stop-to-the-overpopulation-of-the-world</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[This is difficult for me to understand as I don't see anything about this in the popular press, or am I missing it?  Why aren't Governments putting a stop to the overpopulation of the world?  Like how many babies are brought into the world every day that there aren't any resources for and parents don't have the means to take care of them?  In certain cases not even food or shelter?  Yet they are allowed to be born?  Why are people crying so much about poor families with six small children in a boat from France to the UK?  Why did those six small children come into being?  Were they created so the parents can get on a small boat and be treated with more sympathy?<br />
<br />
Shouldn't there be some rules and regulations before someone is allowed to become pregnant?  Like show proof of being able to take care of the child first.  Maybe a requirement to register with an authority after a contract of marriage or a contract of some sort has been established as showing the couple or person fit to take care of children.  Then apply for a license to have X number of children with proof of ability to take care of them.  And maybe a reporting system afterwards in which the license has to be renewed after every so many years.<br />
<br />
Like how many homeless children are there in the world?  And the source of the problem is never really attended to.  <br />
<br />
Like everything is based on greed and corruption.  The more people that countries can get the more demand for products, the more taxes in overall, the richer the rich.  But still, why are the Governments not making an issue of it?  Isn't that the easier way of trying to control the environmental crisis?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is difficult for me to understand as I don't see anything about this in the popular press, or am I missing it?  Why aren't Governments putting a stop to the overpopulation of the world?  Like how many babies are brought into the world every day that there aren't any resources for and parents don't have the means to take care of them?  In certain cases not even food or shelter?  Yet they are allowed to be born?  Why are people crying so much about poor families with six small children in a boat from France to the UK?  Why did those six small children come into being?  Were they created so the parents can get on a small boat and be treated with more sympathy?<br />
<br />
Shouldn't there be some rules and regulations before someone is allowed to become pregnant?  Like show proof of being able to take care of the child first.  Maybe a requirement to register with an authority after a contract of marriage or a contract of some sort has been established as showing the couple or person fit to take care of children.  Then apply for a license to have X number of children with proof of ability to take care of them.  And maybe a reporting system afterwards in which the license has to be renewed after every so many years.<br />
<br />
Like how many homeless children are there in the world?  And the source of the problem is never really attended to.  <br />
<br />
Like everything is based on greed and corruption.  The more people that countries can get the more demand for products, the more taxes in overall, the richer the rich.  But still, why are the Governments not making an issue of it?  Isn't that the easier way of trying to control the environmental crisis?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mars Civilization - Feasible or not?]]></title>
			<link>https://post4vps.com/Thread-Mars-Civilization-Feasible-or-not</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 18:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://post4vps.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=1421">Sn1F3rt</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://post4vps.com/Thread-Mars-Civilization-Feasible-or-not</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello friends, <br />
<br />
Finally found some respite after two weeks of strenous club duties. So today I'm gonna discuss about Mars exploration, some recent developments and upcoming missions. Well I've been following this content ever since I've watched the movie 'Mission Mangal' as that was quite appealing to me. <br />
<br />
So first let's talk about the topic of this thread itself - <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Is a civilization on Mars possible AND practically feasible?</span> There are a number of factors which are gone play a role in deciding this. Of course, there's surviving conditions for human beings that is the topmost priority. But that's not all. There are many more things which have to be taken care of, if we're thinking about establishing a proper civilization on Mars. When I mentioned feasibility, other things like technology might be developed but the main area of concern, as of now, is economic feasibility. The budget of the Mangalyaan mission by ISRO was around INR 400 crore, whereas it was around 5 times this for NASA's Curiosity Rover. These things clearly state that it's not gonna be possible, at all to carry humans to Mars if such a tiny satellite carrying a Alto sized rover, can incur such high costs. Think if it was a hundred humans instead of that rover. The budget would've to be a thousand times compared to the former. Who's gonna issue these costs? The first and foremost concern is economic viability, which has to be significantly taken care of. <br />
<br />
Now let's speak of a very recent development by NASA's Curiosity Rover, just a couple of days ago. Here's the article for everyone's reference: <a href="https://www.news18.com/amp/news/buzz/nasas-curiosity-rover-finds-mysterious-spike-in-oxygen-levels-on-mars-scientists-puzzled-2395423.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.news18.com/amp/news/buzz/nas...95423.html</a> : and it's worth a careful read. It highlights what a great discovery the rover has made by asserting that Mars has 30% more oxygen in it's atmosphere than expected. The reason of this huge spike is still unknown, which is certainly not due to processes like photosynthesis as living organisms lack on Mars. This is a great food for thought for scientists, as well as for all of us. This will give rise to be avenues and change of our concepts regarding Mars, which will eventually lead to higher developments. <br />
<br />
The last thing of my post today would be the NASA's 2020 mission to Mars which will again pave roads to many unknown facts about the Red Planet, which will subsequently lead to better knowledge of the Martian surface, as the Rover shall land and study the surface of the planet. <br />
<br />
With these points in mind, come on guys, let's talk of space science, Martian Missions and possiblity of life on the planet. Eagerly waiting for your responses. <br />
<br />
Regards,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hello friends, <br />
<br />
Finally found some respite after two weeks of strenous club duties. So today I'm gonna discuss about Mars exploration, some recent developments and upcoming missions. Well I've been following this content ever since I've watched the movie 'Mission Mangal' as that was quite appealing to me. <br />
<br />
So first let's talk about the topic of this thread itself - <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Is a civilization on Mars possible AND practically feasible?</span> There are a number of factors which are gone play a role in deciding this. Of course, there's surviving conditions for human beings that is the topmost priority. But that's not all. There are many more things which have to be taken care of, if we're thinking about establishing a proper civilization on Mars. When I mentioned feasibility, other things like technology might be developed but the main area of concern, as of now, is economic feasibility. The budget of the Mangalyaan mission by ISRO was around INR 400 crore, whereas it was around 5 times this for NASA's Curiosity Rover. These things clearly state that it's not gonna be possible, at all to carry humans to Mars if such a tiny satellite carrying a Alto sized rover, can incur such high costs. Think if it was a hundred humans instead of that rover. The budget would've to be a thousand times compared to the former. Who's gonna issue these costs? The first and foremost concern is economic viability, which has to be significantly taken care of. <br />
<br />
Now let's speak of a very recent development by NASA's Curiosity Rover, just a couple of days ago. Here's the article for everyone's reference: <a href="https://www.news18.com/amp/news/buzz/nasas-curiosity-rover-finds-mysterious-spike-in-oxygen-levels-on-mars-scientists-puzzled-2395423.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.news18.com/amp/news/buzz/nas...95423.html</a> : and it's worth a careful read. It highlights what a great discovery the rover has made by asserting that Mars has 30% more oxygen in it's atmosphere than expected. The reason of this huge spike is still unknown, which is certainly not due to processes like photosynthesis as living organisms lack on Mars. This is a great food for thought for scientists, as well as for all of us. This will give rise to be avenues and change of our concepts regarding Mars, which will eventually lead to higher developments. <br />
<br />
The last thing of my post today would be the NASA's 2020 mission to Mars which will again pave roads to many unknown facts about the Red Planet, which will subsequently lead to better knowledge of the Martian surface, as the Rover shall land and study the surface of the planet. <br />
<br />
With these points in mind, come on guys, let's talk of space science, Martian Missions and possiblity of life on the planet. Eagerly waiting for your responses. <br />
<br />
Regards,]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Robotics - The Future Shaper or Destroyer?]]></title>
			<link>https://post4vps.com/Thread-Robotics-The-Future-Shaper-or-Destroyer</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 10:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://post4vps.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=1421">Sn1F3rt</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://post4vps.com/Thread-Robotics-The-Future-Shaper-or-Destroyer</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hey guys,<br />
<br />
Finally I found sometime to post this, which I wanted to post since the last few days. <br />
<br />
As the title itself suggests, this is in regards to the growing influence of technology in our daily lives. From a simple call to complex functions, everything is influenced by technology nowadays. <br />
<br />
Among this, I'd like to highlight the emerging influence of Robotics in this sector. These days, a lot of innovation is taking place in this area. It's a rapidly emerging field for jobs and is if utmost importance. The other day, we'd a workshop at our school. It was organised by NIIT, New Delhi a well-reputed University in India. The professor who'd come to counsel also highlighted this. She said that Robotics is so rapidly emerging that by 2024, this industry will be occupying 23% of the GDP and will be employing millions of people around the globe. <br />
<br />
This to definitely good, considering that I'm associated with this. We'd a Arduino workshop in our city, organized by IIT Delhi. Of course, I couldn't attend it, as it involved financial investment. But as far as I heard from my juniors who did attend, it was very fruitful and they taught about the basics of C language too, which forms the base of Arduino. <br />
<br />
It's indeed good that we're having such a technological revolution, however, I think we're losing human values and morals due to this transition. My view is that we're not being able to preserve the humane feelings, which otherwise would well-balance out these revolution. <br />
<br />
For instance, the other day I received a newsletter in which I read that, a school in Bangalore becomes the first in India to formally introduce and be implement the concept of robo-teachers. What robo-teachers? Sounds weird, doesn't it? Well it's true, read about this <a href="https://m.timesofindia.com/city/bengaluru/at-this-bengaluru-school-robots-teach-and-teachers-mentor/amp_articleshow/70867664.cms" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">here</a><br />
<br />
What are we heading towards? It's indeed a definite achievement that everything is heading towards automation, but not something to be appreciated so much, unless we're ready to bear is deadly consequences. Tell me something, can a robo-teacher ever replace a human teacher? Can those humanly values of love, compassion and care be ever executed by a machine, which is programmed to nothing beyond teaching? A.I. right? Artificial Intelligence. Wow! Such a solid word. But are the works done by it as solid? Can a tablet or a laptop filled with the most valued educational matter in every replace a book? You think it's possible? I don't. <br />
<br />
I will never stand by such an idiotic concept. If machines teach humans, they're ultimately programming them to be machines, nothing else. Mark my words! There will be a day, when humans will regret this, but then it'll be too late. Thing's are still under control. Humans make robots, not vice-versa. If robots start manufacturing humanoids, then ... I've nothing to say. <br />
<br />
Robots are good slaves but bad masters. If things continue this way, a day will come when robots will take over the world, and we'll be their peons. That day we'll be able to do nothing, but just gaze till it's all over. A thing which humans don't understand if that they make robots- why allow them to take three better of us? <br />
<br />
I think I've spoken a lot. Now it's your turn guys. Lemme know what you think about this. I'm sure we'll have a great discussion on this. <br />
<br />
Regards,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hey guys,<br />
<br />
Finally I found sometime to post this, which I wanted to post since the last few days. <br />
<br />
As the title itself suggests, this is in regards to the growing influence of technology in our daily lives. From a simple call to complex functions, everything is influenced by technology nowadays. <br />
<br />
Among this, I'd like to highlight the emerging influence of Robotics in this sector. These days, a lot of innovation is taking place in this area. It's a rapidly emerging field for jobs and is if utmost importance. The other day, we'd a workshop at our school. It was organised by NIIT, New Delhi a well-reputed University in India. The professor who'd come to counsel also highlighted this. She said that Robotics is so rapidly emerging that by 2024, this industry will be occupying 23% of the GDP and will be employing millions of people around the globe. <br />
<br />
This to definitely good, considering that I'm associated with this. We'd a Arduino workshop in our city, organized by IIT Delhi. Of course, I couldn't attend it, as it involved financial investment. But as far as I heard from my juniors who did attend, it was very fruitful and they taught about the basics of C language too, which forms the base of Arduino. <br />
<br />
It's indeed good that we're having such a technological revolution, however, I think we're losing human values and morals due to this transition. My view is that we're not being able to preserve the humane feelings, which otherwise would well-balance out these revolution. <br />
<br />
For instance, the other day I received a newsletter in which I read that, a school in Bangalore becomes the first in India to formally introduce and be implement the concept of robo-teachers. What robo-teachers? Sounds weird, doesn't it? Well it's true, read about this <a href="https://m.timesofindia.com/city/bengaluru/at-this-bengaluru-school-robots-teach-and-teachers-mentor/amp_articleshow/70867664.cms" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">here</a><br />
<br />
What are we heading towards? It's indeed a definite achievement that everything is heading towards automation, but not something to be appreciated so much, unless we're ready to bear is deadly consequences. Tell me something, can a robo-teacher ever replace a human teacher? Can those humanly values of love, compassion and care be ever executed by a machine, which is programmed to nothing beyond teaching? A.I. right? Artificial Intelligence. Wow! Such a solid word. But are the works done by it as solid? Can a tablet or a laptop filled with the most valued educational matter in every replace a book? You think it's possible? I don't. <br />
<br />
I will never stand by such an idiotic concept. If machines teach humans, they're ultimately programming them to be machines, nothing else. Mark my words! There will be a day, when humans will regret this, but then it'll be too late. Thing's are still under control. Humans make robots, not vice-versa. If robots start manufacturing humanoids, then ... I've nothing to say. <br />
<br />
Robots are good slaves but bad masters. If things continue this way, a day will come when robots will take over the world, and we'll be their peons. That day we'll be able to do nothing, but just gaze till it's all over. A thing which humans don't understand if that they make robots- why allow them to take three better of us? <br />
<br />
I think I've spoken a lot. Now it's your turn guys. Lemme know what you think about this. I'm sure we'll have a great discussion on this. <br />
<br />
Regards,]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[What do you mean by Quantum fluctuation?]]></title>
			<link>https://post4vps.com/Thread-What-do-you-mean-by-Quantum-fluctuation</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2019 13:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://post4vps.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=318">Manal</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://post4vps.com/Thread-What-do-you-mean-by-Quantum-fluctuation</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[I've been wondering this since yesterday because I saw a Tedtalk video on YouTube explaining this. Now scientists believe that out of sheer nothingness, a big bang occurred. Now the main question is, how did the "bang" happen? If it is absolutely nothing, no dimensions, no energy, and nothing, how can energy be released at such a great amount that caused the formation of the universe?<br />
<br />
Scientist says this happened because "randomly" a term named "Quantum fluctuation" happened which changed everything. I don't digest this. If it was "absolute nothingness", then how come "quantum" existed in nothingness? Nothingness means absolute null, nothing could have happened at any random event because there wouldn't be any chance for something to trigger the bang.<br />
<br />
<br />
My other question is if scientists say "Energy can neither be created nor be destroyed", then how does big bang happen? I mean, the "bang" itself released such a huge amount of energy that the universe came into existence. If this is something that comes up as a question, then why is the statement "Energy can neither be created nor be destroyed" still valid? <br />
<br />
No, Google doesn't find me a satisfying answer to these questions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I've been wondering this since yesterday because I saw a Tedtalk video on YouTube explaining this. Now scientists believe that out of sheer nothingness, a big bang occurred. Now the main question is, how did the "bang" happen? If it is absolutely nothing, no dimensions, no energy, and nothing, how can energy be released at such a great amount that caused the formation of the universe?<br />
<br />
Scientist says this happened because "randomly" a term named "Quantum fluctuation" happened which changed everything. I don't digest this. If it was "absolute nothingness", then how come "quantum" existed in nothingness? Nothingness means absolute null, nothing could have happened at any random event because there wouldn't be any chance for something to trigger the bang.<br />
<br />
<br />
My other question is if scientists say "Energy can neither be created nor be destroyed", then how does big bang happen? I mean, the "bang" itself released such a huge amount of energy that the universe came into existence. If this is something that comes up as a question, then why is the statement "Energy can neither be created nor be destroyed" still valid? <br />
<br />
No, Google doesn't find me a satisfying answer to these questions.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Chandrayaan-2 : NASA's the fate decider]]></title>
			<link>https://post4vps.com/Thread-Chandrayaan-2-NASA-s-the-fate-decider</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 09:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://post4vps.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=1421">Sn1F3rt</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://post4vps.com/Thread-Chandrayaan-2-NASA-s-the-fate-decider</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello guys,<br />
<br />
So as y'all know I'd urged a lot for this section to come into play, and finally our request has been accepted. Thanks to <dvz_me_placeholder id="0" /> for creating this section. Special thanks to <dvz_me_placeholder id="1" />, <dvz_me_placeholder id="2" />, <dvz_me_placeholder id="3" /> and all others who supported this idea. So now it's my duty to keep this section going. So let's get started with the first official post in this section. <br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">NOTE: This is a respite for me, Fein tomorrow's Chemistry exam. Took exactly 20 minutes to compose this, but feeling much better now.</span><br />
<br />
As y'all might be aware of Chandrayaan-2 mission by ISRO (Indian Space Research Organization), it's the first in the world to get it landed on the south pole of the Moon. And it was 95% successful. <br />
<br />
The mission consisted of the lander Vikram and the rover Pragyan. The mission had a 14-day lifetime as it is largely powered by solar energy and one lunar day is equal to 14 Earth days. After these 14-days there will be a damn cold single night, but enough to freeze vital parts of the lander and Robert, making them non-functional. However, this fact in turn is now sealing the fate of ISRO. <br />
<br />
The lander was supposed to be landing in the South Pole of the Moon on 7th September, 2019 between 1:30AM IST and 2:00AM IST. Everything was going right until a 2-km distance above the Moon, when the lander stopped contacting with the communicator which sends signals to the Earth. <br />
<br />
The mission had been assumed to be a failure but, the Chandrayaan-2's orbiter revived our hopes the next morning. It showed that even after losing contact with the Earth data center, the lander did a successful hard-landing on the Moon and is now in a tilted position. What happened was that at the point if losing contact, the lander did a somersault and owing to phenomena like charged dust thrust and such others, managed to land on the Moon. <br />
<br />
However, the rover, Pragyan never hatched out of his shell and that's the cause of most desperation. Efforts are being put in full-swing to re-establish communication but we've not been successful so far. Unfortunately, we've only 4-5 days left to do whatever was intended, since the lunar day should end by September 20-21. <br />
<br />
NASA has been very cooperative in this field. They've extended their support to ISRO and are now helping in the reestablishment of the communication. Today NASA's lunar orbiter will fly over that point Vikram landed, and will try to take exact photographs of it and also try to communicate with it. Let's hope for the best guys!<br />
<br />
There's one thing that ISRO can surely do - to take the Chandrayaan-2's orbiter closer to the Moon. This is because if the solar panels are damaged, the lander may send weak signals, which may be picked if the lander is close to the lunar surface. But this involves a high amount of risk too, as if the lander gets pulled by the gravity of the Moon and crashes the mission is doomed forever. It'll definitely be tried perhaps if the NASA's lunar orbiter is not able to do anything, as the last hope if ISRO. <br />
<br />
Guys ISRO needs your prayers and well-wishes so that all the efforts of the scientists may not be in vain. Extend your support by praying for the success of the mission and comment your views on the topic here. <br />
<br />
Eagerly waiting for what you're thinking about this mission. <br />
<br />
Regards,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hello guys,<br />
<br />
So as y'all know I'd urged a lot for this section to come into play, and finally our request has been accepted. Thanks to <dvz_me_placeholder id="0" /> for creating this section. Special thanks to <dvz_me_placeholder id="1" />, <dvz_me_placeholder id="2" />, <dvz_me_placeholder id="3" /> and all others who supported this idea. So now it's my duty to keep this section going. So let's get started with the first official post in this section. <br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">NOTE: This is a respite for me, Fein tomorrow's Chemistry exam. Took exactly 20 minutes to compose this, but feeling much better now.</span><br />
<br />
As y'all might be aware of Chandrayaan-2 mission by ISRO (Indian Space Research Organization), it's the first in the world to get it landed on the south pole of the Moon. And it was 95% successful. <br />
<br />
The mission consisted of the lander Vikram and the rover Pragyan. The mission had a 14-day lifetime as it is largely powered by solar energy and one lunar day is equal to 14 Earth days. After these 14-days there will be a damn cold single night, but enough to freeze vital parts of the lander and Robert, making them non-functional. However, this fact in turn is now sealing the fate of ISRO. <br />
<br />
The lander was supposed to be landing in the South Pole of the Moon on 7th September, 2019 between 1:30AM IST and 2:00AM IST. Everything was going right until a 2-km distance above the Moon, when the lander stopped contacting with the communicator which sends signals to the Earth. <br />
<br />
The mission had been assumed to be a failure but, the Chandrayaan-2's orbiter revived our hopes the next morning. It showed that even after losing contact with the Earth data center, the lander did a successful hard-landing on the Moon and is now in a tilted position. What happened was that at the point if losing contact, the lander did a somersault and owing to phenomena like charged dust thrust and such others, managed to land on the Moon. <br />
<br />
However, the rover, Pragyan never hatched out of his shell and that's the cause of most desperation. Efforts are being put in full-swing to re-establish communication but we've not been successful so far. Unfortunately, we've only 4-5 days left to do whatever was intended, since the lunar day should end by September 20-21. <br />
<br />
NASA has been very cooperative in this field. They've extended their support to ISRO and are now helping in the reestablishment of the communication. Today NASA's lunar orbiter will fly over that point Vikram landed, and will try to take exact photographs of it and also try to communicate with it. Let's hope for the best guys!<br />
<br />
There's one thing that ISRO can surely do - to take the Chandrayaan-2's orbiter closer to the Moon. This is because if the solar panels are damaged, the lander may send weak signals, which may be picked if the lander is close to the lunar surface. But this involves a high amount of risk too, as if the lander gets pulled by the gravity of the Moon and crashes the mission is doomed forever. It'll definitely be tried perhaps if the NASA's lunar orbiter is not able to do anything, as the last hope if ISRO. <br />
<br />
Guys ISRO needs your prayers and well-wishes so that all the efforts of the scientists may not be in vain. Extend your support by praying for the success of the mission and comment your views on the topic here. <br />
<br />
Eagerly waiting for what you're thinking about this mission. <br />
<br />
Regards,]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[SCANDALS - another meaning]]></title>
			<link>https://post4vps.com/Thread-SCANDALS-another-meaning</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2019 15:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://post4vps.com/member.php?action=profile&uid=461">rudra</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://post4vps.com/Thread-SCANDALS-another-meaning</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Errrm.. hehe<br />
<br />
Scandals...I think we all know what that word means. Something juicy and interesting yet not one we usually want to accept in public that we know about. <br />
<br />
But here is another meaning. This seemed so interesting when i first came to know about it that I wanted to share with you all.<br />
<br />
Speciated by CANcer Development AnimaL - SCANDAL<br />
<br />
  First it came to some scientists as a theoretical possibility that transmissible cancer **1 cell might give rise to new kind of life. **2<br />
  Recently, some biologists who use genetic analysis to know more about the world of the living say that they may have found the first candidate for such a 'scandal'!! yes <img src="https://post4vps.com/images/emoji/biggrin.png" alt="Big Grin" title="Big Grin" class="smilie smilie_4" /><br />
<br />
 There is this 200 or so types of certain parasites that live part of their lives in the cells of fish and the other part in some worms which seem to have exceptionally small size gene pool. To explain that scientists are testing this 'scandal' hypothesis as a possible explanation.<br />
<br />
**1 transmissible cancer... Tasmanian Devils suffer from such a cancer. it looks like tumors on nose.<br />
<br />
**2 This idea first came when genetic analysis of certain parasites showed that they had genes in them found in complex tissue of higher complexity/level lives. How did those genes came in them..may bethis way..<br />
<br />
Interesting .. haan ?<br />
<br />
<img src="https://post4vps.com/images/emoji/biggrin.png" alt="Big Grin" title="Big Grin" class="smilie smilie_4" /><br />
<br />
Thaks for reading.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Errrm.. hehe<br />
<br />
Scandals...I think we all know what that word means. Something juicy and interesting yet not one we usually want to accept in public that we know about. <br />
<br />
But here is another meaning. This seemed so interesting when i first came to know about it that I wanted to share with you all.<br />
<br />
Speciated by CANcer Development AnimaL - SCANDAL<br />
<br />
  First it came to some scientists as a theoretical possibility that transmissible cancer **1 cell might give rise to new kind of life. **2<br />
  Recently, some biologists who use genetic analysis to know more about the world of the living say that they may have found the first candidate for such a 'scandal'!! yes <img src="https://post4vps.com/images/emoji/biggrin.png" alt="Big Grin" title="Big Grin" class="smilie smilie_4" /><br />
<br />
 There is this 200 or so types of certain parasites that live part of their lives in the cells of fish and the other part in some worms which seem to have exceptionally small size gene pool. To explain that scientists are testing this 'scandal' hypothesis as a possible explanation.<br />
<br />
**1 transmissible cancer... Tasmanian Devils suffer from such a cancer. it looks like tumors on nose.<br />
<br />
**2 This idea first came when genetic analysis of certain parasites showed that they had genes in them found in complex tissue of higher complexity/level lives. How did those genes came in them..may bethis way..<br />
<br />
Interesting .. haan ?<br />
<br />
<img src="https://post4vps.com/images/emoji/biggrin.png" alt="Big Grin" title="Big Grin" class="smilie smilie_4" /><br />
<br />
Thaks for reading.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>