arrow_upward

Pages (3):
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
#21
I guess this is the most negative rated game of 2016, because the game did not met the expectations, and the developer made alot of promises that he still did not do. to bad i was hyped for it, but i hear of my friends it was not so good. so i did not bought it, to bad though as it looks like a nice game.
#22
just 1 opinion for this game... Boring. at the beggining the game is preety cool, but when you play 30hours you can realise the low size of the game is because it's the same, over and over again, same planets (well, change colours and wheater randomly) and same ruiins/buildings and things to do. yeah 3 trilions of starts planets, blabla... all the same, if it was true the size game would be diferent. you land in maybe 30 planets diferents which change colour and wheater conditions, they just make you believe you go light years away.... also the spacial base, same and same, only change sometimes the shape of the base.
여보세요  Big Grin   
 | Thanks to Host4Fun and Post4VPS for great VPS 1 |
#23
(11-27-2016, 01:07 AM)dragon1600 Wrote: I guess this is the most negative rated game of 2016, because the game did not met the expectations, and the developer made alot of promises that he still did not do. to bad i was hyped for it, but i hear of my friends it was not so good. so i did not bought it, to bad though as it looks like a nice game.

I am okay with the developer not bringing in a lot of new features, but not bringing in what they promised for is just not acceptable at all...
Thank you VPSlices and Post4VPS for your beautiful VPS!
Pages (3):


person_pin_circle Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Sponsors: VirMach - Host4Fun - CubeData - Evolution-Host - HostDare - Hyper Expert - Shadow Hosting - Bladenode - Hostlease - RackNerd - ReadyDedis - Limitless Hosting