03-02-2020, 04:14 PM
Review of VPS 17
Provided by one of best p4v sponsor(for me the best one)
Provided by one of best p4v sponsor(for me the best one)
Hello, i have won VPS recently almost one month ago but i wanted to review when i get to know its good sides and bad sides and i am happy while writing the review since i haven't seen much downsides but still i would like to point out every single for more betterment of VPS 17 since we dont have much european VPSs here in post4vps.
VPS basic information:
Let's begin with benchmarks now
Geek benchmarks
VPS basic information:
[b]Disk Space: 35 GB SSD[/b]
[b]RAM: 1 GB[/b]
[b]IP Addresses: 1x IPv4[/b]
[b]Virtualization: KVM[/b]
[b]Monthly Traffic: 500 GB[/b]
[b]Location: Amsterdam/Lelystad, Netherlands[/b]
[b]Control Panel: Ask Admin[/b]
[b]Windows: Yes. Windows is allowed.[/b]
[b]RAM: 1 GB[/b]
[b]IP Addresses: 1x IPv4[/b]
[b]Virtualization: KVM[/b]
[b]Monthly Traffic: 500 GB[/b]
[b]Location: Amsterdam/Lelystad, Netherlands[/b]
[b]Control Panel: Ask Admin[/b]
[b]Windows: Yes. Windows is allowed.[/b]
Let's begin with benchmarks now
Geek benchmarks
Now let's talk about single core and multi-core scores provided by geekbench and now it's just shocked me since I have checked those scores when i had this vps few months ago and the single-core and multi-core scores were too low but just checked now and there is a massive difference in previous scores and current.
Single-core score: 1174
Multi-core scores: 3172
Processor information:
Single-core score: 1174
Multi-core scores: 3172
Processor information:
Name
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
Topology
2 Processors, 2 Cores
Identifier
GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 62 Stepping 4
Base Frequency
2.10 GHz
L1 Instruction Cache
32.0 KB x 1
L1 Data Cache
32.0 KB x 1
L2 Cache
4.00 MB x 1
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
Topology
2 Processors, 2 Cores
Identifier
GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 62 Stepping 4
Base Frequency
2.10 GHz
L1 Instruction Cache
32.0 KB x 1
L1 Data Cache
32.0 KB x 1
L2 Cache
4.00 MB x 1
The processor performance is good as far my game server is concerned since i have been using this vps for my game server and my game server performance is quite good but i didn't have many players in my server but still the server was smooth and i am sure it will run smooth as it is now even with more players
System Information:
System Information:
Operating System
Linux 3.16.0-10-amd64 x86_64
Model
Red Hat KVM
Motherboard
N/A
Memory
1000 MB
BIOS
Seabios 0.5.1
By HR benchmark script:Linux 3.16.0-10-amd64 x86_64
Model
Red Hat KVM
Motherboard
N/A
Memory
1000 MB
BIOS
Seabios 0.5.1
System Info
-----------
Processor : Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz
CPU Cores : 2
Frequency : 2095.152 MHz
Memory : 1000 MB
Swap : buffers/cache: MB
Uptime : 10 days, 7:10,
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 8 (jessie)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 3.16.0-10-amd64
Hostname : P4v.hostlease.com
-----------
Processor : Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz
CPU Cores : 2
Frequency : 2095.152 MHz
Memory : 1000 MB
Swap : buffers/cache: MB
Uptime : 10 days, 7:10,
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 8 (jessie)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 3.16.0-10-amd64
Hostname : P4v.hostlease.com
Complete Single-core performance scores
Single-Core Score
1774
Crypto Score
1560
Integer Score
1986
Floating Point Score
1842
Memory Score
1248
Single-Core Score
1774
Crypto Score
1560
Integer Score
1986
Floating Point Score
1842
Memory Score
1248
Complete Multi-core scores performance
Multi-Core Score
3172
Crypto Score
2863
Integer Score
3736
Floating Point Score
3434
Memory Score
1588
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Multi-Core Score
3172
Crypto Score
2863
Integer Score
3736
Floating Point Score
3434
Memory Score
1588
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Speed test:
Retrieving speedtest.net configuration...
Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
Testing from HostSlim B.V. (xx.xx.xx.xx)...
Selecting best server based on latency...
Hosted by KKTCELL (Nicosia) [36.85 km]: 94.748 ms
Testing download speed........................................
Download: 103.07 Mbits/s
Testing upload speed..................................................
Upload: 39.65 Mbits/s
[/termainal]
[terminal]Speedtest (IPv4 only)
---------------------
Your public IPv4 is xx.xxx.xxx.xx
Location Provider Speed
CDN Cachefly 66.7MB/s
Lenoir, NC, US Dacentec 13.3MB/s
Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 6.79MB/s
Seattle, WA, US Softlayer 7.96MB/s
San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 4.64MB/s
Washington, DC, US Leaseweb 5.29MB/s
Tokyo, Japan Linode 2.99MB/s
Singapore Softlayer 5.05MB/s
Taiwan Hinet 3.02MB/s
Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 28.8MB/s
Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 23.4MB/s
Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
Testing from HostSlim B.V. (xx.xx.xx.xx)...
Selecting best server based on latency...
Hosted by KKTCELL (Nicosia) [36.85 km]: 94.748 ms
Testing download speed........................................
Download: 103.07 Mbits/s
Testing upload speed..................................................
Upload: 39.65 Mbits/s
[/termainal]
[terminal]Speedtest (IPv4 only)
---------------------
Your public IPv4 is xx.xxx.xxx.xx
Location Provider Speed
CDN Cachefly 66.7MB/s
Lenoir, NC, US Dacentec 13.3MB/s
Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 6.79MB/s
Seattle, WA, US Softlayer 7.96MB/s
San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 4.64MB/s
Washington, DC, US Leaseweb 5.29MB/s
Tokyo, Japan Linode 2.99MB/s
Singapore Softlayer 5.05MB/s
Taiwan Hinet 3.02MB/s
Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 28.8MB/s
Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 23.4MB/s
Well, now its time to talk about some downsides of vps 17 as i have said before as well this vps is great but i am not satisfied with its connection as it is 1gb connection but i am sure with time they will improve their connection speed as well for sure.
Disk Speeds:
Disk Speeds:
Disk Speed
----------
I/O (1st run) : 243 MB/s
I/O (2nd run) : 253 MB/s
I/O (3rd run) : 286 MB/s
Average I/O : 260 MB/s or .26 GB/s
----------
I/O (1st run) : 243 MB/s
I/O (2nd run) : 253 MB/s
I/O (3rd run) : 286 MB/s
Average I/O : 260 MB/s or .26 GB/s
Concluding Remarks:
Well, the VPS 17 is good for my needs and i really liked after getting for 2nd time and its really improved performance wise since i had this vps few months ago as well but my game server was lagging very badly
The only downside of the vps is connection speed
Rating: 8/10
Well, the VPS 17 is good for my needs and i really liked after getting for 2nd time and its really improved performance wise since i had this vps few months ago as well but my game server was lagging very badly
The only downside of the vps is connection speed
Rating: 8/10