10-17-2018, 11:06 AM
Hello, Community,
First Off all: I have not been paid to make this review. this was part of the beta testing.
Bladenode.com asked for beta testers around ~10th of October. I gladly entered as a beta tester.
Since I knew who the owner was behind bladenode I had some expectations that I already can spoil you:
Pretty snappy service.
index:
1. About bladenode.
2. What I got as a beta tester.
3. Panel.
4. Benchmarks.
|_ 4.1 Default Bench.
|_ 4.2 Disk.
|_ 4.3 Network.
5. Vps usage.
6. Final thoughts.
7. Rating
8. sources.
1. About Bladenode.
BladeNode Web Hosting was started with a mission to provide premium hosting at half the price without sacrificing features, reliability, and customer support. We wanted to create a web hosting company that was easy to use, reliable, and that everyone could afford. We are also backed up by great customer support, that is available 24/7.
2. what was the beta testing?.
the beta was vps line.
I got a vps with 1 core 1 gig ram and 10 gig disk space. pretty neat!.
3. panel.
![[Image: ybnWl2l.png]](https://i.imgur.com/ybnWl2l.png)
4. Benchmarks.
4.1Default Bench.
4.2 Disk.
4.3 Network.
![[Image: 7724181298.png]](http://www.speedtest.net/result/7724181298.png)
it maybe doesn't look like I have big numbers. but I can utilize all if this.
5. Vps usage.
I currently stressing the server and see what it handles on certain situations.
and with the performance, i get this would for my CSS delivery.
6. Final thoughts.
I personally like the vps. if I paid for this it serves pretty well for my small sites. so if you care about reliability and have 10p/m.
this is a good option to choose from.
7. rating.
I would definitely give this provider a 9/10. vps is really snappy for me. as I know the owner is someone that knows what his business is about.
with a higher scores is something we need to see in how improves again over time.
8. sources.
website: https://bladenode.com/
contact: https://bladenode.com/contact-us/
whmcs panel: https://portal.bladenode.com/clientarea.php
this was my review.
Good luck.
First Off all: I have not been paid to make this review. this was part of the beta testing.
Bladenode.com asked for beta testers around ~10th of October. I gladly entered as a beta tester.
Since I knew who the owner was behind bladenode I had some expectations that I already can spoil you:
Pretty snappy service.
index:
1. About bladenode.
2. What I got as a beta tester.
3. Panel.
4. Benchmarks.
|_ 4.1 Default Bench.
|_ 4.2 Disk.
|_ 4.3 Network.
5. Vps usage.
6. Final thoughts.
7. Rating
8. sources.
1. About Bladenode.
BladeNode Web Hosting was started with a mission to provide premium hosting at half the price without sacrificing features, reliability, and customer support. We wanted to create a web hosting company that was easy to use, reliable, and that everyone could afford. We are also backed up by great customer support, that is available 24/7.
2. what was the beta testing?.
the beta was vps line.
I got a vps with 1 core 1 gig ram and 10 gig disk space. pretty neat!.
3. panel.
4. Benchmarks.
4.1Default Bench.
Code: (Select All)
Benchmark started on Mon Oct 15 12:25:52 PDT 2018
Full benchmark log: /root/bench.log
System Info
-----------
Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5670 @ 2.93GHz
CPU Cores : 1
Frequency : 2925.996 MHz
Memory : 985 MB
Swap : MB
Uptime : 3 min,
OS : Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 4.15.0-22-generic
Hostname : perry.bladenode.com
Speedtest (IPv4 only)
---------------------
Your public IPv4 is (censored)
Location Provider Speed
CDN Cachefly 77.1MB/s
Atlanta, GA, US Coloat 52.2MB/s
Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 85.8MB/s
Seattle, WA, US Softlayer 28.0MB/s
San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 30.8MB/s
Washington, DC, US Softlayer 35.9MB/s
Tokyo, Japan Linode 14.2MB/s
Singapore Softlayer 5.50MB/s
Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 10.2MB/s
Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 52.4MB/s
Disk Speed
----------
I/O (1st run) : 194 MB/s
I/O (2nd run) : 179 MB/s
I/O (3rd run) : 183 MB/s
Average I/O : 185.333 MB/s4.2 Disk.
Code: (Select All)
root@perry:~# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
udev 466M 0 466M 0% /dev
tmpfs 99M 2.8M 96M 3% /run
/dev/vda1 9.4G 2.0G 6.9G 23% /
tmpfs 493M 0 493M 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs 5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock
tmpfs 493M 0 493M 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
tmpfs 99M 0 99M 0% /run/user/0Code: (Select All)
root@perry:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) copied, 6.76124 s, 159 MB/s4.3 Network.
it maybe doesn't look like I have big numbers. but I can utilize all if this.
5. Vps usage.
I currently stressing the server and see what it handles on certain situations.
and with the performance, i get this would for my CSS delivery.
6. Final thoughts.
I personally like the vps. if I paid for this it serves pretty well for my small sites. so if you care about reliability and have 10p/m.
this is a good option to choose from.
7. rating.
I would definitely give this provider a 9/10. vps is really snappy for me. as I know the owner is someone that knows what his business is about.
with a higher scores is something we need to see in how improves again over time.
8. sources.
website: https://bladenode.com/
contact: https://bladenode.com/contact-us/
whmcs panel: https://portal.bladenode.com/clientarea.php
this was my review.
Good luck.
![[Image: a3ad5cfbf5.png]](http://puu.sh/lIWOV/a3ad5cfbf5.png)
