01-19-2020, 04:17 PM
@LightDestory
I'm afraid you have misunderstood what @tryp4vps was trying to say in his post. I cannot say that it is that easy to misunderstood his post though. I think that I understood his post correctly on the first read already.
Let me try to rephrase what @tryp4vps said in a easy to understand way: It is unlikely that Google would punish websites behind CloudFlare that are good and absolutely innoncent just because those websites share a CloudFlare IP that is also known to host spammy or bad websites. Googles search engine is smarter than that.
@tryp4vps Correct me if I'm wrong please or otherwise maybe confirm what I said.
I'm afraid you have misunderstood what @tryp4vps was trying to say in his post. I cannot say that it is that easy to misunderstood his post though. I think that I understood his post correctly on the first read already.
Let me try to rephrase what @tryp4vps said in a easy to understand way: It is unlikely that Google would punish websites behind CloudFlare that are good and absolutely innoncent just because those websites share a CloudFlare IP that is also known to host spammy or bad websites. Googles search engine is smarter than that.
@tryp4vps Correct me if I'm wrong please or otherwise maybe confirm what I said.