03-09-2016, 05:50 PM
(03-08-2016, 01:56 AM)Mr.Monkey Wrote:(03-07-2016, 11:19 PM)Hagmui Wrote:(03-06-2016, 05:36 PM)Mr.Monkey Wrote: How good is Cobalt's compared towards C@C? I know that someone said that you can use C@C to setup VMs inside of one, what is this?
Do you mean nested visualization? Running vmware inside vmware?
https://communities.vmware.com/docs/DOC-8970
Well, I mean someone mentioned that Cobalt does that. Uses a VM to hosts many other VMs on some doubtfull hardware, would that just affect speed and stability especially if its oversold as it is?
Could be, but i doubt it, since it does not make sense for them other than being even slower. Would only make sense if they sold vmware hosts, which they don't.
Edit:
Looked it up, the Xeon does not support it. So no, they are not doing it. I think they are just putting to many VMs on their 2 hosts. Plus the TE Mining they offer on top does not make it any better.