01-20-2021, 02:48 PM
I'm sure ISIS (if it really exists) can use any other end to end encryption app as well including Whatsapp. So for me I question the motive for publishing the article about ISIS using Telegram and then when they discovered they were being tracked, Signal. It was obvious that the slant of the article was negative towards Telegram and Signal. This paragraph specifically sounds incredible to me:
If that event of June 24 really existed, why bring it up now? What is the motive behind the article? And how true are the facts?
Quote:Muhammad Farid, a 23-year-old ISIS militant, was arrested on June 24 during a security raid on a flour mill in the outskirts of Peshawar where the group was planning a massive attack.
Farid confessed to interrogators after arrest that he had killed 32 people including 15 policemen and five sex workers Express Tribune reported.
However, it was the Afghan citizen’s phone revealed to security officials ISIS’s preferred method of communication.
If that event of June 24 really existed, why bring it up now? What is the motive behind the article? And how true are the facts?