[ikk157]

Excellent review @ikk157!  Enjoyed reading it.  You have a gift of the gab as they say.  A way with words.

Am very happy to hear that the VPS performed OK from the moment CentOS was loaded.  And apologies for the misunderstanding before.

If I may ask - did you disable Selinux before you started to use CentOS 7, or did everything work straight off the bat?  In other words did you need to make any modifications before you were able to use CentOS successfully?

Your VPS 9 (Seattle) was one of the first two VPSs that the technicians at Virmach upgraded from OpenVZ 6 to KVM, hence why I am asking the question, because looks as though they must have done a real good job with the first 2 post4vps VPS 9 upgrades - Seattle and Chicago, whereas in later upgrades of the other 6 VPSs, they started to skip steps to speed the process.  Mine was the very last VPS 9 that got upgraded, and I've been having serious issues with it.

I'm particularly thinking of what @fChk had commented in another thread that if the sponsor had properly put the upgraded VPSs together the issue with Selinux should not have occurred.  It is a sign that possibly the reconfiguration of the later upgrades didn't go as detailed and with the same care as the first two VPSs - Chicago and Seattle had been.

In the meanwhile I'm happy VPS 9 Seattle is performing well in spite of not having been able to work with Ubuntu on it.

Thank you for the kind words! I highly appreciate that you find my review good.

As for your question:

Nope! I didn’t have to do anything at all! Centos worked perfectly “out of the box”. I’ve seen the complaints regarding the other VPSs experiencing issues after the KVM upgrade. The one with the decreased storage specially caught my attention. It’s quite odd in my opinion that Virmach is doing the upgrades manually. They should’ve automated the whole process to speed things up and get more consistent results. Correct me if I’m wrong.