[mzltest]

Hmm... How about just allowing 2nd VPS for short term for all current VPS holders?

Then it will not reduce any chance of getting a VPS for new members.

And we also do not need to limit the 2nd VPS pool to "VPS 1 only".

That is more affordable and better.For this purpose I'd suggest that P$ as the price of these 2nd vpses.eg.Reserve at least 1 vps for new members,than put all remaining vpses into a pool where current holders can auction points for temporily usage of these vpses.The maxium term is 3 months or something and the starting price is 150 P$/month or 350 P$/2mo ,$550 P$/3mo (discourage long-term holding) and not renewable.

In my solution,P$ were given more value as I currently didn't see it has much value(except renewing vps in months with insuffient post) so instead of posting,I made it of something that can wider uses.@deanhills .Anyway just an idea.