06-03-2019, 02:58 AM
I also agree with a change in the rules. I like the idea that we should get to know them first as well.
I don't mind the advertisements - provided they have substance and good content and most of all they're not a repeat of the previous advertisement. So if someone has made an advertisement and repeats the same advertisement in 7 days, then that advertisement will be spam canned. However if the person has a valid new marketing campaign with a good deal, 2 days after the one before, I'll be suspicious, but if it has a good and a NEW deal in it, then I will be OK with it.
I completely agree there should be rules for the content of a deal. Particularly with a TOS, Web link, etc. Information should be very clear, posted in the right forum and provide accurate and open information about the monthly charge for the service/s. The information should be transparent, and the business should have been alive for at least a while, unless the person is known to us and a member of the Forum for a while, wishing to start a new business.
I don't mind the advertisements - provided they have substance and good content and most of all they're not a repeat of the previous advertisement. So if someone has made an advertisement and repeats the same advertisement in 7 days, then that advertisement will be spam canned. However if the person has a valid new marketing campaign with a good deal, 2 days after the one before, I'll be suspicious, but if it has a good and a NEW deal in it, then I will be OK with it.
I completely agree there should be rules for the content of a deal. Particularly with a TOS, Web link, etc. Information should be very clear, posted in the right forum and provide accurate and open information about the monthly charge for the service/s. The information should be transparent, and the business should have been alive for at least a while, unless the person is known to us and a member of the Forum for a while, wishing to start a new business.