arrow_upward

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Making VPS Reviews More Beneficial for Sponsors
#3
Yeah. I hope what I said about benchmark won't be misinterpreted. I just wanted to point Benchmarks alone wont make the review complete. It's that personally I wouldn't add it if it's already posted several times and I'm getting same results. I prefer to leave a link to where there are benchmarks are already posted. Now if I get different benchmarks I would post it. But there isn't a big chance of that. I don't know if it's matter a lot to the sponsor but it is important for users to know what the give servers really comes with.

Actually I like the @deanhills idea of VPS names. It might work better. I wonder if it will work even better if we do it like RackNerd 1GB, RackNerd 2GB etc. It gives a better idea about the package. But yes this will make it easier. But anyway I don't think it's hard to do original way either. I mean We do something similar in title when we create a vps request thread.

Ofc too many links could lock Spammy but I don't think 2 links would do that. I said that because it's standard method using a link at top and bottom of a review since often reader wouldn't bother to scroll back just to find the link at top. Name at top and Link at bottom works too.

I don't think we are going to get much contribution form sponsors in review threads often enough. I rarely see sponsors post at all. If would be great if they do though.


~ Be yourself everybody else is taken ~






Messages In This Thread
RE: Making VPS Reviews More Beneficial for Sponsors - by xdude - 12-22-2020, 04:57 PM

person_pin_circle Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
Sponsors: VirMach - Host4Fun - CubeData - Evolution-Host - HostDare - Hyper Expert - Shadow Hosting - Bladenode - Hostlease - RackNerd - ReadyDedis - Limitless Hosting