[deanhills]

I just kind of feel that you're favoriting yourself and your conditions since you always get to keep your VPS by meeting quota.

 I'm not sure I get this point, can you explain it to me?

Bottom line of my suggestion was to ensure that post4vps gets all of the posts it is supposed to get.  If someone doesn't make their quota of posts the one month and lose their VPS and then immediately gets a new VPS the next month, it may mean that they have skipped on making their quota of posts for the month before. Not only is that unfair to other members but my main focus was healthy traffic for post4vps so it can have lots of traffic always and keep to be healthy and thriving so we all can have the benefit of a continuity of service in its future. Purpose of a post4vps is to get traffic.  And our part is to make the 20 posts a month that are asked for. 

Every P2H community is in need of new members, Those members are not to stand for a while if they don't get their VPS in their first 1-2 months - 3 Maximum, Meaning if you keep giving VPSs (Knowing that they are already very limited) to those who recently came back after long periods of inactivity this will give priority to them in Giveaways and lessen the new member's priority - Hence resulting in injusticeness.

I'm sorry, I don't understand what you're saying here.  I didn't mention anything about new members.  As far as I can see post4vps is very successful with attracting new members and helping them feel at home in the Forum.  This is definitely a great Forum to post to.

My suggestion was only about how the US$ that are earned should provide a more accurate view of the VPS service the person has received.  I.e. if a member earned 12,000 US$ then it can say 12,000 US$ of which X US$ benefit has been received.

This suggestion of mine seems to have been confusing some of the members though, so hence why I asked to leave this to the Giveaway Manager to manage.  Maybe it's better that @perryoo11 close this thread.