[Manal]

I also don't agree with 2 VPS per users, after incident with freevps.us however it's really sound greatest concept people can grab 2 VPS from same platform from 2 different provider or same. If this suggest ever accepted then i don't need we can see quality post from holders (included me) We will take this requirement as our job and post anything to complete it.

All we've to keep this forum active with quality posts which helpful for someone else. Thanks to all sponsors, and everyone please don't use adblocker least for this forum.

Agreed with you. This idea doesn't seem great but hey, look. It looks like we're having bigger giveaways day-by-day but we have a very little base of people around having the need of a VPS server.
So for now, I would agree with 1 user-2 VPS policy or 2 VPS/user.

But this can create some serious issues when a user with two VPS is a lot active but there are users with No VPS. The one with VPS(s) takes advantage by completing his/her monthly requirement by making quality posts, but new users would not get the chance if the pool is out of VPS. And this wouldn't be fair if we take away one out of two VPS from the VPS holder and make it available to the pool as he is too contributing towards the community by making quality posts.

So if I think deeper, I vote for one VPS/user policy.
(Sorry for lulposting haha).