[fChk]

Hello there!... @chanalku91

I must confess that I overlooked this review of yours!.. Which is a shame, because it has a decent amount of data that I'm looking for. Nice job!

So,
> the UnixBench score is good (ie, 582.9), at least better than mine in its simple test.
> the GeekBench 5 score is 412 (single core), which is also a notch better than mine in single core test.
But be careful when comparing numbers. Always use the same/exact version when comparing (yours was 5.1.0). GeekBench scoring varies a lot even within the same major version; the Proof!?

Here are my scores for GeekBench 5.1.1, 5.1.0 and 4.3.1, respectively:
 >> GeekBench 5.1.1 :  368 ;   572
 >> GeekBench 5.1.0 :  392 ;   651
 >> GeekBench 4.3.1 : 1797 ;  2701

Looks like the scoring becomes harsher with each newer versions, which is logical given that it has to much the power of the new CPUs  on the market each year.

Thus, it makes a lot of sense for us to always use the same exact version of GeekBench when comparing CPUs.

> Networking speed is pretty much good!.. I would hope that you'll post the speeds for HR's bench script end-points Too!

> Now, for storage performance!.. I must say that I liked you using fio benchmarking; I think you're actually the first to do that here!

Still, can you also provide the results of the following commands:

Code: (Select All)

# Disk seq.read Speed (Cached)
hdparm -Tt /dev/vda

# Disk seq.read Speed (Direct)
hdparm -Tt --direct /dev/vda

# Disk Seek Rate:
ioping -R /dev/vda

# Disk Sequential Speed:
ioping -RL /dev/vda

Overall, this is a nice review, with real insight onto your VPS inner bowels!..

+1Rep!.. Keep it up!