arrow_upward

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Apple v. Corellium
#5
I am against a private company having the right to not disclose a customer information even if all circumstantial evidence strongly suggest that we are talking about a person who is guilty with a very high probability. Also sure as hell they should allow into the data of people proven to be guilty. People with tags like hardcore criminals or assassins or terrorists should with adequate proof of their deeds should not any right to privacy whatsoever. especially when it comes to data they have on their devices. Any company claiming to take measures to guard that data should get totally dismantled and thrown to the wolves.

end of my rant here.

Now when it comes disclosing data totally based on suspicion that someone might be hiding something big or just because a big entity wants that data, then not allowing that is very praiseworthy ...

Though I wish they would allow more tinkering in their system. I feel so restricted when using apple device. I do not like how their mobile devices work.
Sincere Thanks to VirMach for my VPS9. Also many thanks to Shadow Hosting and cubedata for the experiences I had with their VPSs.


Messages In This Thread
Apple v. Corellium - by tbelldesignco - 12-30-2020, 02:52 PM
RE: Apple v. Corellium - by LightDestory - 12-30-2020, 04:14 PM
RE: Apple v. Corellium - by tbelldesignco - 12-30-2020, 04:59 PM
RE: Apple v. Corellium - by Honey - 12-31-2020, 03:10 AM
RE: Apple v. Corellium - by rudra - 12-31-2020, 05:32 PM
RE: Apple v. Corellium - by tbelldesignco - 12-31-2020, 09:58 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread
Author
Replies
Views
Last Post

person_pin_circle Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Sponsors: VirMach - Host4Fun - CubeData - Evolution-Host - HostDare - Hyper Expert - Shadow Hosting - Bladenode - Hostlease - RackNerd - ReadyDedis - Limitless Hosting