04-01-2020, 11:00 AM
(04-01-2020, 05:15 AM)chanalku91 Wrote:Hi I'm Reflyansyah, last January I was given VPS 6 by Post4Vps after I stopped being the holder of VPS 18!
And after getting VPS 6 I did a lot of experiments and projects that were only designated for fun activities!
But now I started looking for new ideas with VPS 6 after the community that I lived in was destroyed by a team that was paid to report groups on Facebook!
Now some projects are run on VPS 6 but the source code is not stored in this VPS, the reason is to keep the source code safe!
Instead of reading this history, let's just review this VPS! *CMIIW
About VPS providers
BladeNode is a hosting service provider that provides services such as WEB Hosting, VPS Hosting, and DEDICATED Hosting
BladeNode also have a support team that stays 24/7 on-site to help you if you have a problem with their premium service!
For the price of the service itself is quite competitive with large hosting providers such as Vultr and Digital Ocean,
so why not try their services?
VPS Info
Disk Space: 40 GB[/b]
RAM: 2 GB RAM
IP Addresses: 1x IPv4
Virtualization: KVM
Monthly Traffic: 1 TB
Location: Dallas tx
Control Panel: None
Windows: Yes. With valid license - trial license not allowed.
Connection: 1 GBit/s
[b]Notes: You can run Gameservers without any limits
Provided by: Bladenode
System Info
Code: (Select All)System Info
-----------
Processor : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
CPU Cores : 1
Frequency : 2925.998 MHz
Memory : 1829 MB
Swap : 510 MB
Uptime : 5 days, 17:59,
OS : CentOS Linux 8 (Core)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 4.18.0-147.5.1.el8_1.x86_64
Hostname : Hakunime
Data provided by bench.sh from Sohamb03
CPU Benchmark
Previously I told you the specifications of this little VPS!
Now let's make this VPS slow down by benchmarking it!
Code: (Select All)------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Mar 31 2020 07:50:18 - 08:18:04
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 25564171.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3527.0 MWIPS (7.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2462.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 274454.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 74817.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 814627.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 484108.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 117075.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5955.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3025.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 326.1 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 312248.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 25564171.8 2190.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3527.0 641.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 2462.6 572.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 274454.0 693.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74817.1 452.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 814627.1 1404.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 484108.5 389.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 117075.0 292.7
Process Creation 126.0 5955.8 472.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3025.8 713.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 326.1 543.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 312248.4 208.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 582.9
In the UnixBench Software the benchmark results show that VPS 6 given by BladeNode got a score of 582.9!
Now let's test with the next software!
Code: (Select All)Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 412
Multi Core | 400
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/1637918
But with GeekBench 5 Software, this VPS only gets a score of 412 for single core and 400 for multi core!
Next let's test the connection of this VPS, but before that I want to remind you that you must stay at home while the corona virus is spreading!
Port Speed
Code: (Select All)Speedtest (IPv4 only)
---------------------
Your public IPv4 is fffff:00001:00000:0000
Location Provider Speed
CDN Cachefly 61.4MB/s
Atlanta, GA, US @sohamb03 63.2MB/s
Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 62.4MB/s
Seattle, WA, US Softlayer 25.1MB/s
San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 27.2MB/s
Washington, DC, US Leaseweb 31.4MB/s
Sao Paulo, Brazil Softlayer 7.25MB/s
Singapore Softlayer 4.98MB/s
Taiwan Hinet 6.44MB/s
Tokyo, Japan Linode 12.7MB/s
Nuremberg, Germany Hetzner 15.2MB/s
Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 54.8MB/s
Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 43.7MB/s
Milan, Italy Softlayer 54.8MB/s
Melbourne, AU Softlayer 6.20MB/s
Sydney, AU Softlayer 5.91MB/s
Data is provided by bench.sh from Sohamb03 with wget
Code: (Select All)iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
| | |
Bouygues Telecom | Paris, FR (10G) | 713 Mbits/sec | 865 Mbits/sec
Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 753 Mbits/sec | 838 Mbits/sec
WorldStream | The Netherlands (10G) | 666 Mbits/sec | 837 Mbits/sec
wilhelm.tel | Hamburg, DE (10G) | 747 Mbits/sec | 844 Mbits/sec
Biznet | Bogor, Indonesia (1G) | 489 Mbits/sec | 163 Mbits/sec
Hostkey | Moscow, RU (1G) | 571 Mbits/sec | 838 Mbits/sec
Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 894 Mbits/sec | 913 Mbits/sec
Airstream Communications | Eau Claire, WI, US (10G) | 922 Mbits/sec | 911 Mbits/sec
Hurricane Electric | Fremont, CA, US (10G) | 914 Mbits/sec | 922 Mbits/sec
The given bandwidth can be said to be fast especially for me who want a fast connection to backup Game Server data to Google Drive, so this VPS can be said to be one of the VPS with a very fast connection port!
Disk Speed
Code: (Select All)fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50): ---------------------------------
Block Size | 4kb (IOPS) | 64kb (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 19.11 MB/s (4.7k) | 51.37 MB/s (802)
Write | 19.11 MB/s (4.7k) | 51.68 MB/s (807)
Total | 38.22 MB/s (9.5k) | 103.06 MB/s (1.6k)
| |
Block Size | 512kb (IOPS) | 1mb (IOPS)
------ | ----- ---- | --- ----
Read | 51.63 MB/s (100) | 51.72 MB/s (50)
Write | 54.32 MB/s (106) | 55.26 MB/s (53)
Total | 105.95 MB/s (206) | 106.98 MB/s (103)
Code: (Select All)I/O (1st run) : 73.9 MB/s
I/O (2nd run) : 79.0 MB/s
I/O (3rd run) : 81.0 MB/s
Average I/O : 77.9667 MB/s
Data provided by bench.sh from Sohamb03 using dd
Disk Latency
Code: (Select All)4 KiB <<< . (ext4 /dev/vda1 38.8 GiB): request=1 time=427.2 us (warmup)
4 KiB <<< . (ext4 /dev/vda1 38.8 GiB): request=2 time=602.8 us
4 KiB <<< . (ext4 /dev/vda1 38.8 GiB): request=3 time=2.48 ms
4 KiB <<< . (ext4 /dev/vda1 38.8 GiB): request=4 time=464.3 us
4 KiB <<< . (ext4 /dev/vda1 38.8 GiB): request=5 time=2.64 ms
4 KiB <<< . (ext4 /dev/vda1 38.8 GiB): request=6 time=597.5 us
4 KiB <<< . (ext4 /dev/vda1 38.8 GiB): request=7 time=461.7 us (fast)
4 KiB <<< . (ext4 /dev/vda1 38.8 GiB): request=8 time=2.64 ms (slow)
4 KiB <<< . (ext4 /dev/vda1 38.8 GiB): request=9 time=804.7 us
4 KiB <<< . (ext4 /dev/vda1 38.8 GiB): request=10 time=2.83 ms (slow)
--- . (ext4 /dev/vda1 38.8 GiB) ioping statistics ---
9 requests completed in 13.5 ms, 36 KiB read, 665 iops, 2.60 MiB/s
generated 10 requests in 9.00 s, 40 KiB, 1 iops, 4.44 KiB/s
min/avg/max/mdev = 461.7 us / 1.50 ms / 2.83 ms / 1.03 ms
Data provided by IoPing
Experience with this VPS
1. This VPS has experienced downtime of more than 6 hours which certainly makes me have to wait for the VPS to turn on again to test a script that I made!
2. For performance, this VPS has never slowed down!
3. Port speed is very stable!
How about this review? If it's good give this thread 5 stars, and if it's not good give 1 star and give your suggestion in a new post!
And don't forget it's April 1, if you try to lie to me, I won't accept it!
below is the raw file,
If there are suggestions, let me know!
VPS_6_P4V_RAW.zip
https://mir.cr/1A7QXID8
Excellent and greatly detailed review by you! And just like the other reviews, I also like the formatting of yours (I’ve mentioned this several times before, but just in case anyone missed it: it’s almost impossible to use the post formatting tools on mobile).
I really like the CPU frequency, seems to be quite powerful regardless of the fact that you only get a single core.
However, I did notice that the disk speeds aren’t all that impressive. Might not be a huge deal, but definitely something noticeable.
And no, this isn’t an April fool haha. Made me laugh when when you mentioned it lol.
Thank you Post4VPS and VirMach for providing me with VPS9! But now it’s time to say farewell due to my studies.