BladeNode VPS 6 ~ BladeNode ~ Review

chanalku91 · 04-01-2020, 05:15 AM

Hi I'm Reflyansyah, last January I was given VPS 6 by Post4Vps after I stopped being the holder of VPS 18!
And after getting VPS 6 I did a lot of experiments and projects that were only designated for fun activities!
But now I started looking for new ideas with VPS 6 after the community that I lived in was destroyed by a team that was paid to report groups on Facebook!
Now some projects are run on VPS 6 but the source code is not stored in this VPS, the reason is to keep the source code safe!
Instead of reading this history, let's just review this VPS! *CMIIW

About VPS providers
BladeNode is a hosting service provider that provides services such as WEB Hosting, VPS Hosting, and DEDICATED Hosting
BladeNode also have a support team that stays 24/7 on-site to help you if you have a problem with their premium service!
For the price of the service itself is quite competitive with large hosting providers such as Vultr and Digital Ocean,
so why not try their services?

VPS INFORMATION
----------------------------
VPS Plans

Terminal

Disk Space: 40 GB
RAM: 2 GB RAM
IP Addresses: 1x IPv4
Virtualization: KVM
Monthly Traffic: 1 TB
Location: Dallas tx
Control Panel: None
Windows: Yes. With valid license - trial license not allowed.
Connection: 1 GBit/s
Notes: You can run Gameservers without any limits
Provided by: Bladenode

System Info

Terminal

Processor : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
CPU Cores : 1
Frequency : 2925.998 MHz
Memory : 1829 MB
Swap : 510 MB
Uptime : 5 days, 17:59,

OS : CentOS Linux 8 (Core)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 4.18.0-147.5.1.el8_1.x86_64
Hostname : Hakunime

Previously I told you the specifications of this little VPS!
Now let's make this VPS slow down by benchmarking it!

CPU BENCHMARK
----------------------------
Geekbench 5

Terminal

UnixBench

Code: (Select All)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Benchmark Run: Tue Mar 31 2020 07:50:18 - 08:18:04

1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests



Dhrystone 2 using register variables       25564171.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Double-Precision Whetstone                     3527.0 MWIPS (7.2 s, 7 samples)

Execl Throughput                               2462.6 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        274454.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           74817.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        814627.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Pipe Throughput                              484108.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Pipe-based Context Switching                 117075.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Process Creation                               5955.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   3025.8 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    326.1 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)

System Call Overhead                         312248.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)



System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   25564171.8   2190.6

Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3527.0    641.3

Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2462.6    572.7

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     274454.0    693.1

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      74817.1    452.1

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     814627.1   1404.5

Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     484108.5    389.2

Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     117075.0    292.7

Process Creation                                126.0       5955.8    472.7

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       3025.8    713.6

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        326.1    543.6

System Call Overhead                          15000.0     312248.4    208.2

                                                                   ========

System Benchmarks Index Score                                         582.9

DISK BENCHMARK
----------------------------
dd Disk Speed Tests

Terminal

I/O speed(1st run) : 46.6 MB/s
I/O speed(2nd run) : 57.1 MB/s
I/O speed(3rd run) : 62.3 MB/s
Average I/O speed : 55.3 MB/s

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50)

Terminal

Block Size | 4kb (IOPS) | 64kb (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 21.03 MB/s (5.2k) | 34.70 MB/s (542)
Write | 21.04 MB/s (5.2k) | 35.01 MB/s (547)
Total | 42.07 MB/s (10.5k) | 69.71 MB/s (1.0k)
| |
Block Size | 512kb (IOPS) | 1mb (IOPS)
------ | ----- ---- | --- ----
Read | 37.47 MB/s (73) | 26.18 MB/s (25)
Write | 39.42 MB/s (77) | 28.60 MB/s (27)
Total | 76.90 MB/s (150) | 54.78 MB/s (52)

Disk seq.read Speed (Cached)

Terminal

/dev/vda:
Timing cached reads: 14518 MB in 1.99 seconds = 7291.95 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 640 MB in 3.00 seconds = 213.23 MB/sec

Disk seq.read Speed (Direct)

Terminal

/dev/vda:
Timing O_DIRECT cached reads: 6878 MB in 1.99 seconds = 3457.65 MB/sec
Timing O_DIRECT disk reads: 400 MB in 3.07 seconds = 130.18 MB/sec

Disk Seek Rate

Code: (Select All)

--- /dev/vda (block device 20 GiB) ioping statistics ---

6.05 k requests completed in 2.96 s, 23.6 MiB read, 2.05 k iops, 7.99 MiB/s

generated 6.05 k requests in 3.00 s, 23.6 MiB, 2.02 k iops, 7.88 MiB/s

min/avg/max/mdev = 94.0 us / 488.7 us / 8.55 ms / 269.9 us

Disk Sequential Speed

Code: (Select All)

--- /dev/vda (block device 20 GiB) ioping statistics ---

1.03 k requests completed in 2.97 s, 256.5 MiB read, 345 iops, 86.3 MiB/s

generated 1.03 k requests in 3.00 s, 256.8 MiB, 342 iops, 85.6 MiB/s

min/avg/max/mdev = 407.4 us / 2.90 ms / 313.3 ms / 11.2 ms

Disk Latency

Code: (Select All)

4 KiB <<< . (xfs /dev/dm-0 17.0 GiB): request=1 time=335.3 us (warmup)

4 KiB <<< . (xfs /dev/dm-0 17.0 GiB): request=2 time=479.8 us

4 KiB <<< . (xfs /dev/dm-0 17.0 GiB): request=3 time=403.9 us

4 KiB <<< . (xfs /dev/dm-0 17.0 GiB): request=4 time=356.6 us

4 KiB <<< . (xfs /dev/dm-0 17.0 GiB): request=5 time=353.7 us

4 KiB <<< . (xfs /dev/dm-0 17.0 GiB): request=6 time=402.2 us

4 KiB <<< . (xfs /dev/dm-0 17.0 GiB): request=7 time=454.1 us

4 KiB <<< . (xfs /dev/dm-0 17.0 GiB): request=8 time=431.2 us

4 KiB <<< . (xfs /dev/dm-0 17.0 GiB): request=9 time=391.2 us

4 KiB <<< . (xfs /dev/dm-0 17.0 GiB): request=10 time=369.4 us



--- . (xfs /dev/dm-0 17.0 GiB) ioping statistics ---

9 requests completed in 3.64 ms, 36 KiB read, 2.47 k iops, 9.65 MiB/s

generated 10 requests in 9.00 s, 40 KiB, 1 iops, 4.44 KiB/s

min/avg/max/mdev = 353.7 us / 404.7 us / 479.8 us / 41.0 us

NETWORK SPEED TEST
----------------------------
wget Network Speed Tests (IPv4)

Terminal

Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed
CacheFly 205.234.175.175 89.1MB/s
Linode, Tokyo2, JP 139.162.65.37 14.3MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 10.6MB/s
Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 909KB/s
Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 18.3MB/s
Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 2.03MB/s
Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 90.1MB/s
Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 756KB/s
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 10.3MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 503KB/s
Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 7.80MB/s

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4)

Terminal

speedtest-cli Network Speed Tests (IPv4)

Code: (Select All)

  Speedtest by Ookla                                                                                                                                                              

Server: Sprint - Enid, OK (id = 11232)                                                    

ISP: Eonix Corporation                                                             

Latency:     2.37 ms   (0.05 ms jitter)                                               

Download:   938.91 Mbps (data used: 469.8 MB)                                            

Upload:   939.79 Mbps (data used: 469.0 MB)                                       

Packet Loss:     0.0%                                                                   

Result URL: https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/bd97b599-35d4-40ad-8569-7ad1b9301a97

Experience
----------------------------
1. This VPS has experienced downtime of more than 6 hours which certainly makes me have to wait for the VPS to turn on again to test a script that I made!
2. For performance, this VPS has never slowed down!
3. Port speed is very stable!

Notes
----------------------------
Some information was updated on 3 / June / 2020

**Sn1F3rt** · 04-01-2020, 09:46 AM

Exactly review @chanalku91. Forget about the April fool's day, I'm serious. This review is quite elaborate and informative. Honestly, I liked the way you organised your stuff before putting it down in this thread. Great job!

Also, glad to see that my benchmarking script is functioning as expected. You might have gotten a better idea of your VPS's performance as the speedtest is done from places in all the continents (except Antarctica of course).

I'm giving this thread a 4-star and that's bcuz I'd have loved to see an official Speedtest.net benchmark done on the VPS. I recommended using the official cli application - https://speedtest.net/apps/cli - instead of the Python script (as the results are more accurate). Consider doing it about 4-5 times and taking the average and you'll get a good idea of your VPS's performance. Just update the OP with the speedtest results and I'll be more than happy to change my rating to a perfect 5-star. Best of luck with the VPS!

Regards,

chanalku91 · 04-01-2020, 10:47 AM

(04-01-2020, 09:46 AM)sohamb03 Wrote: Exactly review @chanalku91. Forget about the April fool's day, I'm serious. This review is quite elaborate and informative. Honestly, I liked the way you organised your stuff before putting it down in this thread. Great job!

Also, glad to see that my benchmarking script is functioning as expected. You might have gotten a better idea of your VPS's performance as the speedtest is done from places in all the continents (except Antarctica of course).

I'm giving this thread a 4-star and that's bcuz I'd have loved to see an official Speedtest.net benchmark done on the VPS. I recommended using the official cli application - https://speedtest.net/apps/cli - instead of the Python script (as the results are more accurate). Consider doing it about 4-5 times and taking the average and you'll get a good idea of your VPS's performance. Just update the OP with the speedtest results and I'll be more than happy to change my rating to a perfect 5-star. Best of luck with the VPS!

Regards,

Thank you for your helpful feedback!
I would be happy to accept this feedback and update the results at 3 am Western Indonesia Time!

Update : the speedtest results have been updated on the thread @sohamb03

ikk157 · 04-01-2020, 11:00 AM

(04-01-2020, 05:15 AM)chanalku91 Wrote:
Hi I'm Reflyansyah, last January I was given VPS 6 by Post4Vps after I stopped being the holder of VPS 18!
And after getting VPS 6 I did a lot of experiments and projects that were only designated for fun activities!
But now I started looking for new ideas with VPS 6 after the community that I lived in was destroyed by a team that was paid to report groups on Facebook!
Now some projects are run on VPS 6 but the source code is not stored in this VPS, the reason is to keep the source code safe!
Instead of reading this history, let's just review this VPS! *CMIIW

About VPS providers
BladeNode is a hosting service provider that provides services such as WEB Hosting, VPS Hosting, and DEDICATED Hosting
BladeNode also have a support team that stays 24/7 on-site to help you if you have a problem with their premium service!
For the price of the service itself is quite competitive with large hosting providers such as Vultr and Digital Ocean,
so why not try their services?

VPS Info

Terminal
Disk Space: 40 GB
RAM: 2 GB RAM
IP Addresses: 1x IPv4
Virtualization: KVM
Monthly Traffic: 1 TB
Location: Dallas tx
Control Panel: None
Windows: Yes. With valid license - trial license not allowed.
Connection: 1 GBit/s
[b]Notes: You can run Gameservers without any limits
Provided by: Bladenode

[/b]

System Info

Code: (Select All)
System Info ----------- Processor : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+ CPU Cores : 1 Frequency : 2925.998 MHz Memory : 1829 MB Swap : 510 MB Uptime : 5 days, 17:59, OS : CentOS Linux 8 (Core) Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 4.18.0-147.5.1.el8_1.x86_64 Hostname : Hakunime Data provided by bench.sh from Sohamb03

CPU Benchmark
Previously I told you the specifications of this little VPS!
Now let's make this VPS slow down by benchmarking it!

Code: (Select All)
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Tue Mar 31 2020 07:50:18 - 08:18:04 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 25564171.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 3527.0 MWIPS (7.2 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2462.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 274454.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 74817.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 814627.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 484108.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 117075.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 5955.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3025.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 326.1 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 312248.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 25564171.8 2190.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3527.0 641.3 Execl Throughput 43.0 2462.6 572.7 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 274454.0 693.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74817.1 452.1 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 814627.1 1404.5 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 484108.5 389.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 117075.0 292.7 Process Creation 126.0 5955.8 472.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3025.8 713.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 326.1 543.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 312248.4 208.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 582.9

In the UnixBench Software the benchmark results show that VPS 6 given by BladeNode got a score of 582.9!
Now let's test with the next software!

Code: (Select All)
Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test: --------------------------------- Test | Value | Single Core | 412 Multi Core | 400 Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/1637918

But with GeekBench 5 Software, this VPS only gets a score of 412 for single core and 400 for multi core!
Next let's test the connection of this VPS, but before that I want to remind you that you must stay at home while the corona virus is spreading!

Port Speed

Code: (Select All)
Speedtest (IPv4 only) --------------------- Your public IPv4 is fffff:00001:00000:0000 Location Provider Speed CDN Cachefly 61.4MB/s Atlanta, GA, US @sohamb03 63.2MB/s Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 62.4MB/s Seattle, WA, US Softlayer 25.1MB/s San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 27.2MB/s Washington, DC, US Leaseweb 31.4MB/s Sao Paulo, Brazil Softlayer 7.25MB/s Singapore Softlayer 4.98MB/s Taiwan Hinet 6.44MB/s Tokyo, Japan Linode 12.7MB/s Nuremberg, Germany Hetzner 15.2MB/s Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 54.8MB/s Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 43.7MB/s Milan, Italy Softlayer 54.8MB/s Melbourne, AU Softlayer 6.20MB/s Sydney, AU Softlayer 5.91MB/s Data is provided by bench.sh from Sohamb03 with wget

Code: (Select All)
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4): --------------------------------- Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | | | Bouygues Telecom | Paris, FR (10G) | 713 Mbits/sec | 865 Mbits/sec Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 753 Mbits/sec | 838 Mbits/sec WorldStream | The Netherlands (10G) | 666 Mbits/sec | 837 Mbits/sec wilhelm.tel | Hamburg, DE (10G) | 747 Mbits/sec | 844 Mbits/sec Biznet | Bogor, Indonesia (1G) | 489 Mbits/sec | 163 Mbits/sec Hostkey | Moscow, RU (1G) | 571 Mbits/sec | 838 Mbits/sec Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 894 Mbits/sec | 913 Mbits/sec Airstream Communications | Eau Claire, WI, US (10G) | 922 Mbits/sec | 911 Mbits/sec Hurricane Electric | Fremont, CA, US (10G) | 914 Mbits/sec | 922 Mbits/sec

The given bandwidth can be said to be fast especially for me who want a fast connection to backup Game Server data to Google Drive, so this VPS can be said to be one of the VPS with a very fast connection port!

Disk Speed

Code: (Select All)
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50): --------------------------------- Block Size | 4kb (IOPS) | 64kb (IOPS) ------ | --- ---- | ---- ---- Read | 19.11 MB/s (4.7k) | 51.37 MB/s (802) Write | 19.11 MB/s (4.7k) | 51.68 MB/s (807) Total | 38.22 MB/s (9.5k) | 103.06 MB/s (1.6k) | | Block Size | 512kb (IOPS) | 1mb (IOPS) ------ | ----- ---- | --- ---- Read | 51.63 MB/s (100) | 51.72 MB/s (50) Write | 54.32 MB/s (106) | 55.26 MB/s (53) Total | 105.95 MB/s (206) | 106.98 MB/s (103)

Code: (Select All)
I/O (1st run) : 73.9 MB/s I/O (2nd run) : 79.0 MB/s I/O (3rd run) : 81.0 MB/s Average I/O : 77.9667 MB/s Data provided by bench.sh from Sohamb03 using dd

Disk Latency

Code: (Select All)
4 KiB <<< . (ext4 /dev/vda1 38.8 GiB): request=1 time=427.2 us (warmup) 4 KiB <<< . (ext4 /dev/vda1 38.8 GiB): request=2 time=602.8 us 4 KiB <<< . (ext4 /dev/vda1 38.8 GiB): request=3 time=2.48 ms 4 KiB <<< . (ext4 /dev/vda1 38.8 GiB): request=4 time=464.3 us 4 KiB <<< . (ext4 /dev/vda1 38.8 GiB): request=5 time=2.64 ms 4 KiB <<< . (ext4 /dev/vda1 38.8 GiB): request=6 time=597.5 us 4 KiB <<< . (ext4 /dev/vda1 38.8 GiB): request=7 time=461.7 us (fast) 4 KiB <<< . (ext4 /dev/vda1 38.8 GiB): request=8 time=2.64 ms (slow) 4 KiB <<< . (ext4 /dev/vda1 38.8 GiB): request=9 time=804.7 us 4 KiB <<< . (ext4 /dev/vda1 38.8 GiB): request=10 time=2.83 ms (slow) --- . (ext4 /dev/vda1 38.8 GiB) ioping statistics --- 9 requests completed in 13.5 ms, 36 KiB read, 665 iops, 2.60 MiB/s generated 10 requests in 9.00 s, 40 KiB, 1 iops, 4.44 KiB/s min/avg/max/mdev = 461.7 us / 1.50 ms / 2.83 ms / 1.03 ms Data provided by IoPing

Experience with this VPS
1. This VPS has experienced downtime of more than 6 hours which certainly makes me have to wait for the VPS to turn on again to test a script that I made!
2. For performance, this VPS has never slowed down!
3. Port speed is very stable!

How about this review? If it's good give this thread 5 stars, and if it's not good give 1 star and give your suggestion in a new post!
And don't forget it's April 1, if you try to lie to me, I won't accept it!

below is the raw file,
If there are suggestions, let me know!

VPS_6_P4V_RAW.zip
https://mir.cr/1A7QXID8

Excellent and greatly detailed review by you! And just like the other reviews, I also like the formatting of yours (I’ve mentioned this several times before, but just in case anyone missed it: it’s almost impossible to use the post formatting tools on mobile).

I really like the CPU frequency, seems to be quite powerful regardless of the fact that you only get a single core.

However, I did notice that the disk speeds aren’t all that impressive. Might not be a huge deal, but definitely something noticeable.

And no, this isn’t an April fool haha. Made me laugh when when you mentioned it lol.

chanalku91 · 04-01-2020, 11:20 AM

(04-01-2020, 11:00 AM)ikk157 Wrote: Excellent and greatly detailed review by you! And just like the other reviews, I also like the formatting of yours (I’ve mentioned this several times before, but just in case anyone missed it: it’s almost impossible to use the post formatting tools on mobile).

I really like the CPU frequency, seems to be quite powerful regardless of the fact that you only get a single core.

However, I did notice that the disk speeds aren’t all that impressive. Might not be a huge deal, but definitely something noticeable.

And no, this isn’t an April fool haha. Made me laugh when when you mentioned it lol.

I want to reveal the fact that I wrote all these reviews on a mobile device, I only need software like QuickEditor, Termius and Github to write all of this, then copy the results to post4vps

ikk157 · 04-01-2020, 01:19 PM

(04-01-2020, 11:20 AM)chanalku91 Wrote: I want to reveal the fact that I wrote all these reviews on a mobile device, I only need software like QuickEditor, Termius and Github to write all of this, then copy the results to post4vps

No way! I never knew you could do that! Won’t you be limited doing it that way since obviously the markdown in these services might not be the same as the one the forum uses?

I, myself, use Termius as well. But may I know what you used GitHub for? Is it to get the scripts? If that’s the case, it’s nothing different to what I’ve been doing.

However, the QuickEditor part is completely different.

chanalku91 · 04-01-2020, 02:02 PM

(04-01-2020, 01:19 PM)ikk157 Wrote: No way! I never knew you could do that! Won’t you be limited doing it that way since obviously the markdown in these services might not be the same as the one the forum uses?

I, myself, use Termius as well. But may I know what you used GitHub for? Is it to get the scripts? If that’s the case, it’s nothing different to what I’ve been doing.

However, the QuickEditor part is completely different.

I use Github to make all the contents of this review, and Quick Editor to correct all typing errors like I misplaced code [b] in the Connection section and it's already been fixed!
I did not immediately write it on the forum for fear of losing data due to a broken internet connection!

ikk157 · 04-01-2020, 05:36 PM

(04-01-2020, 02:02 PM)chanalku91 Wrote: I use Github to make all the contents of this review, and Quick Editor to correct all typing errors like I misplaced code [b] in the Connection section and it's already been fixed!
I did not immediately write it on the forum for fear of losing data due to a broken internet connection!

Thank you for the information. You do have a point with losing all of what you’ve typed because of a sudden disconnection or accidental refresh. Had that happen to me many times and it’s insanely frustrating. This is why I write my reviews on my iPhone’s built-in notes app.

As for Quick Editor, I unfortunately can’t find the app on the AppStore. Which leads me to believe that it’s either android only, or simply not available in the US store. Guess i’ll have to find an alternative that works just as well if not better.

Anyways let’s not get out of the topic of the review itself haha.

**phoenixwolf** · 04-03-2020, 05:24 AM

I want to thank you for the very detailed review. I want to address a few things. The downtime was caused by our data center wanting to do an upgrade on a switch that they never told me that they were going to do. We have struggled with this data center about this and I believe we now have this resolved.

Next, I want to update anyone who might use VPS 6 in the future. Our disk speeds have been horrible and I know that. To resolve this we have upgraded the Node01 that VPS 6 was on to a fully pure SSD. This should make a huge difference in performance. I hope whoever uses VPS 6 will also feel it.

**deanhills** · 04-03-2020, 01:54 PM

(04-03-2020, 05:24 AM)phoenixwolf Wrote: Next, I want to update anyone who might use VPS 6 in the future. Our disk speeds have been horrible and I know that. To resolve this we have upgraded the Node01 that VPS 6 was on to a fully pure SSD. This should make a huge difference in performance. I hope whoever uses VPS 6 will also feel it.

This is awesome news. Many thanks @phoenixwolf.

Also I have to add here how fantastic the support is from Bladenode. We had a problem last night for example and turnaround in answering the ticket was almost immediate. This is much appreciated.

Login

Options

Sponsors: VirMach - Host4Fun - CubeData - Evolution-Host - HostDare - Hyper Expert - Shadow Hosting - Bladenode - Hostlease - RackNerd - ReadyDedis - Limitless Hosting