07-26-2017, 04:46 PM
Hi all,
First of all, thanks particularly Dynamo who let me win this VPS 9 during the last giveaway. It is by far the greatest spec VPS I have ever got from any similar post-for-vps website.
Here is my review for it:
VPS 9 Specification
----------------------
Disk Space 100 GB
RAM: 8 GB
IP Addresses: 1x IPv4 & 3 IPv6
Virtualization: OpenVZ
Monthly Traffic: 4 TB
Control Panel: Not provided
Connection: 1Gbps
Full benchmark log (by the classic FreeVPS benchmark script):
System Info
-------------
Processor : Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz
CPU Cores : 2
Frequency : 2401.000 MHz
Memory : 8192 MB
Swap : 0 MB
Uptime : 16 days, 23:35,
OS : Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 2.6.32-042stab113.11
Hostname : (hidden)
Speedtest (IPv4 only)
--------------------------
Your public IPv4 is (hidden)
Location Provider Speed
CDN Cachefly 96.2MB/s
Atlanta, GA, US Coloat 51.5MB/s
Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 44.2MB/s
Seattle, WA, US Softlayer 46.0MB/s
San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 39.1MB/s
Washington, DC, US Softlayer 64.2MB/s
Tokyo, Japan Linode 12.5MB/s
Singapore Softlayer 9.04MB/s
Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 13.2MB/s
Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 81.7MB/s
Remark: this VPS is location in Chicago.
Disk Speed
------------
I/O (1st run) : 740 MB/s
I/O (2nd run) : 564 MB/s
I/O (3rd run) : 679 MB/s
Average I/O : 661 MB/s
My Opinion
-------------
It is no doubt that this VPS has good amount ( 8GB ) of RAM. It fits so well for my applications that are memory-demanding.
Disk speed and network speed are also great. Disk space of 100 GB is good enough for my application storage.
And so far I have experienced no downtime of this VPS. It seems pretty stable and reliable.
This VPS has IPv6 support, which is a bonus for my software development targeting IPv6 connectivity.
CPU is dual-core and is also fine. Although I thought 4-core should be more reasonable for VPSes with similar spec.
No control panel is provided. But I already knew about it before I applied for this VPS.
For this VPS, I would now rate it 8/10. (Because I have not been using it for long, I may amend this rating later.)
EDIT: After using the VPS for more than a year, I would love to re-rate it 9/10 due to its overall stability.
Thanks for reading my VPS 9 review.
First of all, thanks particularly Dynamo who let me win this VPS 9 during the last giveaway. It is by far the greatest spec VPS I have ever got from any similar post-for-vps website.
Here is my review for it:
VPS 9 Specification
----------------------
Disk Space 100 GB
RAM: 8 GB
IP Addresses: 1x IPv4 & 3 IPv6
Virtualization: OpenVZ
Monthly Traffic: 4 TB
Control Panel: Not provided
Connection: 1Gbps
Full benchmark log (by the classic FreeVPS benchmark script):
System Info
-------------
Processor : Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz
CPU Cores : 2
Frequency : 2401.000 MHz
Memory : 8192 MB
Swap : 0 MB
Uptime : 16 days, 23:35,
OS : Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 2.6.32-042stab113.11
Hostname : (hidden)
Speedtest (IPv4 only)
--------------------------
Your public IPv4 is (hidden)
Location Provider Speed
CDN Cachefly 96.2MB/s
Atlanta, GA, US Coloat 51.5MB/s
Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 44.2MB/s
Seattle, WA, US Softlayer 46.0MB/s
San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 39.1MB/s
Washington, DC, US Softlayer 64.2MB/s
Tokyo, Japan Linode 12.5MB/s
Singapore Softlayer 9.04MB/s
Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 13.2MB/s
Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 81.7MB/s
Remark: this VPS is location in Chicago.
Disk Speed
------------
I/O (1st run) : 740 MB/s
I/O (2nd run) : 564 MB/s
I/O (3rd run) : 679 MB/s
Average I/O : 661 MB/s
My Opinion
-------------
It is no doubt that this VPS has good amount ( 8GB ) of RAM. It fits so well for my applications that are memory-demanding.
Disk speed and network speed are also great. Disk space of 100 GB is good enough for my application storage.
And so far I have experienced no downtime of this VPS. It seems pretty stable and reliable.
This VPS has IPv6 support, which is a bonus for my software development targeting IPv6 connectivity.
CPU is dual-core and is also fine. Although I thought 4-core should be more reasonable for VPSes with similar spec.
No control panel is provided. But I already knew about it before I applied for this VPS.
For this VPS, I would now rate it 8/10. (Because I have not been using it for long, I may amend this rating later.)
EDIT: After using the VPS for more than a year, I would love to re-rate it 9/10 due to its overall stability.
Thanks for reading my VPS 9 review.