[Honey]

Yes indeed but I think vps are not this good.

Here's a benchmark I did on my vps there.

Code: (Select All)

CPU model :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz
Number of cores : 1
CPU frequency :  159.375 MHz
Total amount of ram : 512 MB
Total amount of swap : 512 MB
System uptime :   3 days, 7 min,
Download speed from CacheFly: 1.15MB/s
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 1016KB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 1.16MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 1.14MB/s
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 1.16MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 1.15MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 1.13MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 1.15MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 1.16MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 1.16MB/s
I/O speed :  73.0 MB/s

Really? I disagree. For a free vps those are great specs. I have used paid vps plans that are worse.

Well, the paid vps plans you used must be really bad as I agree that VPS is not that good. The internet speeds are just shit ( Good internet speed is always important ), I'm not really sure if the cores are shared or dedicated, probably shared and the CPU is not that good, E5 is much better.