I'm curious about what brand phones our members are using as well as what their dream phone would be. If you are interested to participate in this discussion can you please answer the following questions:
1. Brand and model of your primary cell phone that you use every day. And Android/iOS Version - if available.
2. Brand and model of a secondary cell phone if you are using more than one cell phone. And Android/iOS version if available.
3. Brand and model of your dream phone and preferred Android/iOS
How do you like your primary cell phone? Is it a phone you would want to recommend to others, or a phone that you have only because you can afford to have it or can't afford to have what you really want?
1. My primary cell phone is Sony Xperia X (2016). It has 3 GB RAM and 16 GB storage space. When I purchased it one of my requirements was a nice screen and camera, which is why I was interested in Sony. I've owned many Sony products before, and it has superior screen and camera technology. I've been actively using my Sony Xperia X since 2018. I love this phone. It's not too big, not too small. It handles well. Easy to charge, and it charges reasonably fast. I charge it approx every second/third day depending on whether I've been using Google searches.
![[Image: sony-xperia-xa.jpg]](https://fdn2.gsmarena.com/vv/bigpic/sony-xperia-xa.jpg)
I use my primary cell phone mostly as a phone and doing some minor searches. I also use WhatsApp as the goto media where I live. I'm worried however as I'm still on an older version of Android - 6. Initially in 2018 when I wanted to upgrade the Android version, it turned out too difficult to do - which is the only fault I find with the phone - not so easy to upgrade. I probably could do it via my desktop with the Xperia assistant, but then I'm worried the system may slow down with a higher version of Android - why fiddle with a system that is working well? Because of this limitation I'm very careful with how I use the phone. I ignore phone numbers that I don't know what their source is, as well as text messages. I also don't have e-mails active preferring to work with desktop only.
2. My secondary cell phone is a second hand Samsung Galaxy S7. It's not for me in the same class as my Xperia (although it wins in most of the categories of specs), but still a great phone. 4GB RAM and 32 GB storage. Android 6.
I use this phone for travel only. Battery charges faster than Sony Xperia. Camera is great. But for me my Xperia just has a tad better overall experience.
I guess most people who have phones from 2016 would have upgraded to a new phone a while ago. I'm not thinking of upgrading my Xperia yet. Battery feels as strong as when I first started to use the phone. Ditto Samsung Galaxy S7.
![[Image: samsung-galaxy-s7--.jpg]](https://fdn2.gsmarena.com/vv/bigpic/samsung-galaxy-s7--.jpg)
I also still have three Nokia 1100 dinosaurs. I decided to take them out of my box a few days ago and charge them just to see whether they're still working. Batteries are still as good as when they were purchased almost 8 years ago. I got a temp SIM to test and battery lasts as long as before. These phones just last forever! I'm presently testing my Nokia 1100 with a local SIM. Quite a novel phone "lite" experience.
![[Image: no1100.gif]](https://fdn2.gsmarena.com/vv/bigpic/no1100.gif)
3. I'm still old-fashioned with preferring my desktop computer for computer needs. For a dream phone where money would not be an object, it would probably be a new Sony Xperia with brilliant screen, camera and up to date specs. Latest Android. Even though I really like Android 6 and 7, particularly through use of my Samsung Galaxy Tablet. One thing that irks me with all software is the more up to date the version, the bulkier and complicated it becomes. For that reason it would be nice to have an Android Lite version in my dream phone with less Google presence.
1. Brand and model of your primary cell phone that you use every day. And Android/iOS Version - if available.
2. Brand and model of a secondary cell phone if you are using more than one cell phone. And Android/iOS version if available.
3. Brand and model of your dream phone and preferred Android/iOS
How do you like your primary cell phone? Is it a phone you would want to recommend to others, or a phone that you have only because you can afford to have it or can't afford to have what you really want?
1. My primary cell phone is Sony Xperia X (2016). It has 3 GB RAM and 16 GB storage space. When I purchased it one of my requirements was a nice screen and camera, which is why I was interested in Sony. I've owned many Sony products before, and it has superior screen and camera technology. I've been actively using my Sony Xperia X since 2018. I love this phone. It's not too big, not too small. It handles well. Easy to charge, and it charges reasonably fast. I charge it approx every second/third day depending on whether I've been using Google searches.
![[Image: sony-xperia-xa.jpg]](https://fdn2.gsmarena.com/vv/bigpic/sony-xperia-xa.jpg)
I use my primary cell phone mostly as a phone and doing some minor searches. I also use WhatsApp as the goto media where I live. I'm worried however as I'm still on an older version of Android - 6. Initially in 2018 when I wanted to upgrade the Android version, it turned out too difficult to do - which is the only fault I find with the phone - not so easy to upgrade. I probably could do it via my desktop with the Xperia assistant, but then I'm worried the system may slow down with a higher version of Android - why fiddle with a system that is working well? Because of this limitation I'm very careful with how I use the phone. I ignore phone numbers that I don't know what their source is, as well as text messages. I also don't have e-mails active preferring to work with desktop only.
2. My secondary cell phone is a second hand Samsung Galaxy S7. It's not for me in the same class as my Xperia (although it wins in most of the categories of specs), but still a great phone. 4GB RAM and 32 GB storage. Android 6.
I use this phone for travel only. Battery charges faster than Sony Xperia. Camera is great. But for me my Xperia just has a tad better overall experience.
I guess most people who have phones from 2016 would have upgraded to a new phone a while ago. I'm not thinking of upgrading my Xperia yet. Battery feels as strong as when I first started to use the phone. Ditto Samsung Galaxy S7.
![[Image: samsung-galaxy-s7--.jpg]](https://fdn2.gsmarena.com/vv/bigpic/samsung-galaxy-s7--.jpg)
I also still have three Nokia 1100 dinosaurs. I decided to take them out of my box a few days ago and charge them just to see whether they're still working. Batteries are still as good as when they were purchased almost 8 years ago. I got a temp SIM to test and battery lasts as long as before. These phones just last forever! I'm presently testing my Nokia 1100 with a local SIM. Quite a novel phone "lite" experience.
![[Image: no1100.gif]](https://fdn2.gsmarena.com/vv/bigpic/no1100.gif)
3. I'm still old-fashioned with preferring my desktop computer for computer needs. For a dream phone where money would not be an object, it would probably be a new Sony Xperia with brilliant screen, camera and up to date specs. Latest Android. Even though I really like Android 6 and 7, particularly through use of my Samsung Galaxy Tablet. One thing that irks me with all software is the more up to date the version, the bulkier and complicated it becomes. For that reason it would be nice to have an Android Lite version in my dream phone with less Google presence.
![[Image: sony-xperia-1-iii.jpg]](https://fdn2.gsmarena.com/vv/bigpic/sony-xperia-1-iii.jpg)
This was interesting for me. A top public health specialist in South Africa during the plenary address at an HIV Conference suggested that the well known South African variant of Covid 19, Beta (501Y.V2), could have originated from a patient whose immunity was suppressed because of HIV.
Source: https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/...nequality/
Now that opens limitless possibilities. And could also explain why different communities may have different responses to the same Covid 19 vaccine? And how it only takes one person to start it all.
More info about the science of two epidemics colliding (called a syndemic) appears below:
Quote:" [...] for all we know the original 501Y.V2 variant may have come from an immunosuppressed patient with HIV”.
Source: https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/...nequality/
Now that opens limitless possibilities. And could also explain why different communities may have different responses to the same Covid 19 vaccine? And how it only takes one person to start it all.
Quote:Karim’s thesis was reinforced by a later scientific presentation by Professor Tulio de Oliveira, who described “the possibility that immune-compromised individuals (with HIV being the biggest population in Africa) could become the source of SARS-CoV-2 and variant evolution”.
He deduced that it was “most likely that virus evolution was driven by selective pressure from an impaired antibody response (due to HIV)”.
De Oliveria added that this “highlights the possibility that immune compromised individuals (with HIV being the biggest cause of immunosuppression in Africa) could become the source of SARS-CoV-2 and variant evolution.”
More info about the science of two epidemics colliding (called a syndemic) appears below:
Quote:'This is a syndemic,' said Dr. Jonathan Li, using a term that describes the confluence of two epidemics with the potential to worsen outcomes for both.https://www.krisp.org.za/news.php?id=495
I kind of noticed that ever since the forum downtime last Saturday, the forums stats seems not being updated as they used to. I'm talking specifically about:
> threads Views (not updated any more) and
> Quality Credits (not reset at the end of the day)
And, may be, there are more stuff that I'm not paying attention to that has the same issue.. But the admin should know about!
There must be some script that's not running as scheduled any more that's behind the issues..
Last Saturday, during the downtime, I had a feeling that Post4VPS.com was suffering from a high CPU usage that made the web server timing out resulting in Cloudflare generating 522 Errors. May be it's that script's cron job that's to blame for that...
Anyway, I'm posting this as a heads-up!
> threads Views (not updated any more) and
> Quality Credits (not reset at the end of the day)
And, may be, there are more stuff that I'm not paying attention to that has the same issue.. But the admin should know about!
There must be some script that's not running as scheduled any more that's behind the issues..
Last Saturday, during the downtime, I had a feeling that Post4VPS.com was suffering from a high CPU usage that made the web server timing out resulting in Cloudflare generating 522 Errors. May be it's that script's cron job that's to blame for that...
Anyway, I'm posting this as a heads-up!
Hi all! It's been a little bit since I've done a in-depth post, but I am back and I've got hopefully a great writeup for Amazon Web Services (AWS). This is going to be a little bit of a different writeup because of how modular the components for AWS are so I will start with development and end with deployment and scalability. Hopefully this is a great resource for those looking at AWS deployment!
Development:
So the task at hand was to create a new website for work, that was scalable and would be able to host an active Community, eCommerce and Support Services. We began by creating our EC2 which is the server itself. With Amazon EC2 servers, you have a large variety of OSs to select from, starting at Amazon Linux 2 all the way to macOS and Windows. I selected a Linux Ubuntu EC2, as that is what I am the most familiar with on the Linux side and Amazon Linux 2 uses an entirely different package manager and firewall that I've researched and is a little more difficult to deploy and Apache or NGINX server. The next part of our Development Stack was to select storage requirements, networking components, and modular elements such as off server storage, cdn, load balancers etc. On our server, we allocated 30gb to host Wordpress, Apache, PHP 8.0.4 with modules and your basic odds and ends to get the Wordpress Framework up and running. Knowing that we will have customers all around the globe, I created an S3 attachment which in simple terms is a storage block that we are offloading all of our images, videos and other uploadable content. We attached a CDN on the S3, that way we get great SEO management and customers are able to visit our website and have content delivered as quickly and responsibly as possible. With an Amazon S3, you can use their native CDN service Cloud Front, or you can implement CDNs like CloudFlare as well. With the S3, we also have the website backing up to a separate bucket so if things crash, corrupt, or we need to continue to scale we will EASILY be able to scale up our server needs and redeploy with little to no downtime. The next step of our development process here in the next few weeks is to add on a load balancer, which will work with the CDN to help cache and serve assets so that the main server is not taking a total beating all the time, and add on RDS which is external database block storage, so we will be able to keep our database separate from the main server just for additional security and scalability options.
Deployment:
As we neared closer to launch day, it was super simple to port and migrate our domains and secure the server for live use. We had a few issues with Images caching between the CDN and the live version, but things quickly resolved themselves once GoDaddy made the official DNS transfer from our old host to our EC2 deployment. We also used Yoast SEO paired with SEM Rush and our SEO scoring with google is already up 25% from where we are and the organic traffic we are collecting is already paying for itself just optimizing our website, services and frameworks.
Scalability:
If you are looking at scalable development AWS is honestly an amazing route for you to consider especially if you are looking at eCommerce or Community Driven content. We will be able to easily upgrade our services, storage, hardware without a second of down time. There is a cost associated with all of this, but we went from spending about $600 USD a month to spending about $350-400 USD a month, so it is not cheap, but having the modular scalability is going to make it so simple for our business to scale as we continue to grow. I would love to show off specs, but since this is my job I can't share this information, but I can provide a TL;DR.
TLDR:
Deployment: 7/10 - The AWS console is a little intimidating at first, but they provide amazing documentation to get your EC2, IP, Storage and more created and associated together.
Scalability: 10/10 - Everything is separate from the storage to the IP, so you can easily upgrade and plug and play with little to no downtime!
Security: 10/10 - Amazon has thought of everything when it comes to security, so in my case only myself and my counterpart can access our SSH and console and it takes both of us to unlock or reset a password.
Price: 5/10 - Services is not the cheapest, by any means, but you get so much for what you pay for. If you can overlook the cost and/or are using this for clients that have a significant budget, this will be honestly an amazing route for you to investigate.
Overall: 8/10 - I highly recommend this solution, with some exceptions for smaller developers.
Development:
So the task at hand was to create a new website for work, that was scalable and would be able to host an active Community, eCommerce and Support Services. We began by creating our EC2 which is the server itself. With Amazon EC2 servers, you have a large variety of OSs to select from, starting at Amazon Linux 2 all the way to macOS and Windows. I selected a Linux Ubuntu EC2, as that is what I am the most familiar with on the Linux side and Amazon Linux 2 uses an entirely different package manager and firewall that I've researched and is a little more difficult to deploy and Apache or NGINX server. The next part of our Development Stack was to select storage requirements, networking components, and modular elements such as off server storage, cdn, load balancers etc. On our server, we allocated 30gb to host Wordpress, Apache, PHP 8.0.4 with modules and your basic odds and ends to get the Wordpress Framework up and running. Knowing that we will have customers all around the globe, I created an S3 attachment which in simple terms is a storage block that we are offloading all of our images, videos and other uploadable content. We attached a CDN on the S3, that way we get great SEO management and customers are able to visit our website and have content delivered as quickly and responsibly as possible. With an Amazon S3, you can use their native CDN service Cloud Front, or you can implement CDNs like CloudFlare as well. With the S3, we also have the website backing up to a separate bucket so if things crash, corrupt, or we need to continue to scale we will EASILY be able to scale up our server needs and redeploy with little to no downtime. The next step of our development process here in the next few weeks is to add on a load balancer, which will work with the CDN to help cache and serve assets so that the main server is not taking a total beating all the time, and add on RDS which is external database block storage, so we will be able to keep our database separate from the main server just for additional security and scalability options.
Deployment:
As we neared closer to launch day, it was super simple to port and migrate our domains and secure the server for live use. We had a few issues with Images caching between the CDN and the live version, but things quickly resolved themselves once GoDaddy made the official DNS transfer from our old host to our EC2 deployment. We also used Yoast SEO paired with SEM Rush and our SEO scoring with google is already up 25% from where we are and the organic traffic we are collecting is already paying for itself just optimizing our website, services and frameworks.
Scalability:
If you are looking at scalable development AWS is honestly an amazing route for you to consider especially if you are looking at eCommerce or Community Driven content. We will be able to easily upgrade our services, storage, hardware without a second of down time. There is a cost associated with all of this, but we went from spending about $600 USD a month to spending about $350-400 USD a month, so it is not cheap, but having the modular scalability is going to make it so simple for our business to scale as we continue to grow. I would love to show off specs, but since this is my job I can't share this information, but I can provide a TL;DR.
TLDR:
Deployment: 7/10 - The AWS console is a little intimidating at first, but they provide amazing documentation to get your EC2, IP, Storage and more created and associated together.
Scalability: 10/10 - Everything is separate from the storage to the IP, so you can easily upgrade and plug and play with little to no downtime!
Security: 10/10 - Amazon has thought of everything when it comes to security, so in my case only myself and my counterpart can access our SSH and console and it takes both of us to unlock or reset a password.
Price: 5/10 - Services is not the cheapest, by any means, but you get so much for what you pay for. If you can overlook the cost and/or are using this for clients that have a significant budget, this will be honestly an amazing route for you to investigate.
Overall: 8/10 - I highly recommend this solution, with some exceptions for smaller developers.
Posted by: deanhills - 06-07-2021, 07:45 PM - Forum: Corona Virus (COVID-19) Pandemic
- Replies (10)
I'm curious. Are there members who have used Ivermectin or know of friends or family who have had experience with using Ivermectin for Covid 19?
Here is some basic info about Ivermectin:
https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-u...t-covid-19
In summary it's a drug that is used by vets for treating animals for parasitic and similar diseases. Most Governments in the world have warned their citizens to be careful to use it, and only under prescription from their doctor. The argument is that the drug has been created for use with animals, and animals are different from humans. Humans would need a different preparation of Ivermectin that has been specially prepared for humans.
There is a strong movement in South Africa who believes Ivermectin can be very effective.
Here is some basic info about Ivermectin:
https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-u...t-covid-19
In summary it's a drug that is used by vets for treating animals for parasitic and similar diseases. Most Governments in the world have warned their citizens to be careful to use it, and only under prescription from their doctor. The argument is that the drug has been created for use with animals, and animals are different from humans. Humans would need a different preparation of Ivermectin that has been specially prepared for humans.
There is a strong movement in South Africa who believes Ivermectin can be very effective.
Are there other members like me who are fed up with all of the ads in the middle of blog articles. It's become progressively worse since November last year to the point that I can barely differentiate between ad material and the content of articles!
I've disabled all of the settings for pop ups etc etc. Even went into ads by clicking on the cross to cross them out, and try to find a way to disable them. But not a chance.
Any suggestions for Chrome alternatives? I'm using Mozilla Firefox, which I find is a bit better but I like to have a backup like Chrome. I've just started to try out Brave last night. Any other or better suggestions?
I've disabled all of the settings for pop ups etc etc. Even went into ads by clicking on the cross to cross them out, and try to find a way to disable them. But not a chance.
Any suggestions for Chrome alternatives? I'm using Mozilla Firefox, which I find is a bit better but I like to have a backup like Chrome. I've just started to try out Brave last night. Any other or better suggestions?
It has been a good while since the idea of ipv6.But it is poorly implented in China.Recently my mobile carrier seemed dropping their ipv6 support - probably the reason might be ipv6 addresses are harder to be monitored by GFW and thus cutting off might be the best choice.
From the publicly available data*,the active ipv6 users percentage is 52.19% - at least for me I was in the rest.
* https://china-ipv6.cn/
So now I am wondering whether you guys have ipv6 support.In case you don't know how to test it,you can test at test-ipv6.com .
From the publicly available data*,the active ipv6 users percentage is 52.19% - at least for me I was in the rest.
* https://china-ipv6.cn/
So now I am wondering whether you guys have ipv6 support.In case you don't know how to test it,you can test at test-ipv6.com .
Hostigger (Hostiger), offers web hosting, reseller, virtualization and server solutions since its establishment. Aiming at 100 %customer satisfaction, hostigger continues to serve its customers uninterruptedly. As of the first quarter of 2018, Hostigger has offered thousands of virtualization solutions and hundreds of server solutions.
Our services services to run business critical, or high performance, top-level security, and capacity designed for demanding customers who require Wide Area Network. Hostigger customer portfolio for financial institutions, Telecom and technology organizations includes, among others. Our extensive technical expertise and extensive experience in Problem solving and high-quality technology enables us to provide customized Telecom and IT solutions to any challenge.
As of 2021, we continue to serve under the name of Hostiger. You can reach us at hostigger.com, hostiger.com domains.
Virtualization Infrastructure : VMware ESXI
Control Panel : Power On, Power Off, Reboot
Payment Methods : Credit Card, PayPal, Alipay, iDEAL, BTC, Altcoin
Looking Glass US: https://lg.us.hostigger.com
Looking Glass TR : https://lg.tr.hostigger.com
Looking Glass NL : https://lg.nl.hostigger.com
Skype: live:hostigger
VPS-XS
VPS-S
VPS-M
VPS-L
VPS-XL
VPS-XXL
Hostiger
Our services services to run business critical, or high performance, top-level security, and capacity designed for demanding customers who require Wide Area Network. Hostigger customer portfolio for financial institutions, Telecom and technology organizations includes, among others. Our extensive technical expertise and extensive experience in Problem solving and high-quality technology enables us to provide customized Telecom and IT solutions to any challenge.
As of 2021, we continue to serve under the name of Hostiger. You can reach us at hostigger.com, hostiger.com domains.
Virtualization Infrastructure : VMware ESXI
Control Panel : Power On, Power Off, Reboot
Payment Methods : Credit Card, PayPal, Alipay, iDEAL, BTC, Altcoin
Looking Glass US: https://lg.us.hostigger.com
Looking Glass TR : https://lg.tr.hostigger.com
Looking Glass NL : https://lg.nl.hostigger.com
Skype: live:hostigger
VPS-XS
- 1 Core CPU
- 2 GB RAM
- 20 GB SSD
- Unlimited Bandwidth
- 100 Mbit/s Port
- Only Linux
- 1 Location [TR]
VPS-S
- 2 Core CPU
- 4 GB RAM
- 40 GB SSD
- Unlimited Bandwidth
- 200 Mbit/s Port
- Linux or Windows
- 1 Location [TR]
VPS-M
- 2 Core CPU
- 6 GB RAM
- 60 GB SSD
- Unlimited Bandwidth
- 300 Mbit/s Port
- Linux or Windows
- 1 Location [TR]
VPS-L
- 4 Core CPU
- 8 GB RAM
- 80 GB SSD
- Unlimited Bandwidth
- 300 Mbit/s Port
- Linux or Windows
- 3 Location [TR, US, NL]
VPS-XL
- 6 Core CPU
- 12 GB RAM
- 120 GB SSD
- Unlimited Bandwidth
- 300 Mbit/s Port
- Linux or Windows
- 3 Location [TR, US, NL]
VPS-XXL
- 8 Core CPU
- 16 GB RAM
- 160 GB SSD
- Unlimited Bandwidth
- 300 Mbit/s Port
- Linux or Windows
- 3 Location [TR, US, NL]
- You can renew for the next 1 year at the same price.
- There is no stock limit, a user can order as much as he wants.
- Cannot be combined with other promotions.
- Read the Service Agreement before purchasing.
Hostiger
11 VPSs are Available
- 5x VPS 1 - Host4Fun
- 1x VPS 2 - RackNerd
- 4x VPS 7 - ReadyDedis [USA Locations: Atlanta, NY, Seattle, LA]
- 1x VPS 11 - HostDare
For comparing the VPS Specifications, users can check https://post4vps.com/compare/#1,2,7,11
PLEASE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE SPONSOR BEFORE YOU APPLY - REFER BELOW:
- Users must read and agree to all terms of the SPONSOR (of the VPS which they want) when they apply. These can be found on our Plans Page.
- When you apply, please let us know your preferred OS and the Domain you will be using with the VPS.
- Read Our Forum Rules before applying.
- You should have met our minimum requirements to get VPS.
- Read Application Format before applying. (If the application format is wrong then your Request will be rejected)
- You must post your VPS application in VPS Request Forum.
- Read TOS of VPS providers before applying.
Posted by: Decent12 - 05-31-2021, 07:02 PM - Forum: VPS Reviews
- No Replies
Introduction: Hey, I am here to review my vps 10 which i have won in the recent giveaway and i know there is already a review made by deanhills but i think i would be provide much more details since i have used it almost for a month and i would like to share my experience with you guys aswell.
Lets start with the VPS specifications and then follow it with some benchmarks.
Here are the specifications of VPS 10 and their TOS and requirements but I don't agree with the Game servers Status: Not advised since its one of VPS which i would recommend for gaming servers but maybe the details are old not updated and if thats the case then i would request @deanhills to update it.
Geek Bench
Well, I think the geekbench overall score is a bit low and to be honest i have expected better than this but anyway it still better and working good for my usage.
Unix Bench:
Speed Test:
Just to remind you all that the VPS comes with 125mbps connection but its great to see that VPS connection speed is much better than mentioned.
READ/WRITE Speeds
Well, I have provided all the benchmarks which were possible for me to provide and i guess its enough for anyone to judge the vps by these benchmarks and i will share my experience as well with VPS.
Control Panel: Yeah you heard it right and we have got a panel as well with this vps and for me their control panel is much friendly to new users than other VPSs panels even than digital ocean etc ones.
Gaming Servers: Well the VPS ram is just 1gb but the vps specifications are quite balance and i can recommend it for small gaming servers since i am hosting a small gaming aswell and it doing well.
Rating: 9/10 I didn't find much issues with this VPS since its one of the perfect i have came across in post4vps VPSs and i am quite happy with this vps.
Thanks for reading
Lets start with the VPS specifications and then follow it with some benchmarks.
vCPU: 1
Disk Space: 50 GB
RAM: 1 GB
IP Addresses: 1x IPv4 & /112 IPv6
Virtualization: KVM
Monthly Traffic: 1 TB
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Control Panel: Virtualizor
Connection: 125 Mbit/s
Provided by: Evolution-Host
Terms: TOS
Games servers: Not advised
Requirements: Backlinks to Evolution-Host and Post4VPS are required when a Website is hosted.
Disk Space: 50 GB
RAM: 1 GB
IP Addresses: 1x IPv4 & /112 IPv6
Virtualization: KVM
Monthly Traffic: 1 TB
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Control Panel: Virtualizor
Connection: 125 Mbit/s
Provided by: Evolution-Host
Terms: TOS
Games servers: Not advised
Requirements: Backlinks to Evolution-Host and Post4VPS are required when a Website is hosted.
Here are the specifications of VPS 10 and their TOS and requirements but I don't agree with the Game servers Status: Not advised since its one of VPS which i would recommend for gaming servers but maybe the details are old not updated and if thats the case then i would request @deanhills to update it.
System Info
-----------
Processor : Intel® Core i9-9900K CPU @ 3.60GHz
CPU Cores : 1 @ 3599.990 MHz
Memory : 987 MiB
Swap : 1023 MiB
Uptime : 6 days, 8:53,
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 4.19.0-5-amd64
Hostname : hmrserver
Speedtest (IPv4 only)
---------------------
Your public IPv4 is 00.00.00.00
Location Provider Speed
-------- -------- -----
CDN Cachefly 95.1MB/s
Atlanta, GA, US @sohamb03 9.15MB/s
Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 13.2MB/s
San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 11.1MB/s
Washington, DC, US Leaseweb 11.6MB/s
Sao Paulo, Brazil Softlayer 8.62MB/s
Singapore Softlayer 9.72MB/s
Taiwan Hinet 11.2MB/s
Tokyo, Japan Linode 5.18MB/s
Nuremberg, Germany Hetzner 54.6MB/s
Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 39.6MB/s
Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 38.3MB/s
Milan, Italy Softlayer 36.7MB/s
Sydney, AU Future Hosting 222KB/s
Buffered Sequential Write Speed
-------------------------------
I/O (1st run) : 720 MB/s
I/O (2nd run) : 861 MB/s
I/O (3rd run) : 869 MB/s
Average I/O : 816.667 MB/s
-----------
Processor : Intel® Core i9-9900K CPU @ 3.60GHz
CPU Cores : 1 @ 3599.990 MHz
Memory : 987 MiB
Swap : 1023 MiB
Uptime : 6 days, 8:53,
OS : Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 4.19.0-5-amd64
Hostname : hmrserver
Speedtest (IPv4 only)
---------------------
Your public IPv4 is 00.00.00.00
Location Provider Speed
-------- -------- -----
CDN Cachefly 95.1MB/s
Atlanta, GA, US @sohamb03 9.15MB/s
Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 13.2MB/s
San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 11.1MB/s
Washington, DC, US Leaseweb 11.6MB/s
Sao Paulo, Brazil Softlayer 8.62MB/s
Singapore Softlayer 9.72MB/s
Taiwan Hinet 11.2MB/s
Tokyo, Japan Linode 5.18MB/s
Nuremberg, Germany Hetzner 54.6MB/s
Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 39.6MB/s
Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 38.3MB/s
Milan, Italy Softlayer 36.7MB/s
Sydney, AU Future Hosting 222KB/s
Buffered Sequential Write Speed
-------------------------------
I/O (1st run) : 720 MB/s
I/O (2nd run) : 861 MB/s
I/O (3rd run) : 869 MB/s
Average I/O : 816.667 MB/s
Geek Bench
Running Gathering system information
System Information
Operating System Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
Kernel Linux 4.19.0-5-amd64 x86_64
Model QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
Motherboard N/A
BIOS SeaBIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1
Processor Information
Name Intel Core i9-9900K
Topology 1 Processor, 1 Core
Identifier GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 158 Stepping 12
Base Frequency 3.60 GHz
L1 Instruction Cache 32.0 KB
L1 Data Cache 32.0 KB
L2 Cache 256 KB
L3 Cache 16.0 MB
Memory Information
Size 987 MB
Single-Core
Running AES-XTS
Running Text Compression
Running Image Compression
Running Navigation
Running HTML5
Running SQLite
Running PDF Rendering
Running Text Rendering
Running Clang
Running Camera
Running N-Body Physics
Running Rigid Body Physics
Running Gaussian Blur
Running Face Detection
Running Horizon Detection
Running Image Inpainting
Running HDR
Running Ray Tracing
Running Structure from Motion
Running Speech Recognition
Running Machine Learning
Multi-Core
Running AES-XTS
Running Text Compression
Running Image Compression
Running Navigation
Running HTML5
Running SQLite
Running PDF Rendering
Running Text Rendering
Running Clang
Running Camera
Running N-Body Physics
Running Rigid Body Physics
Running Gaussian Blur
Running Face Detection
Running Horizon Detection
Running Image Inpainting
Running HDR
Running Ray Tracing
Running Structure from Motion
Running Speech Recognition
Running Machine Learning
Uploading results to the Geekbench Browser. This could take a minute or two
depending on the speed of your internet connection.
Upload succeeded. Visit the following link and view your results online:
https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/8195003
Visit the following link and add this result to your profile:
https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/819...key=329876
System Information
Operating System Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
Kernel Linux 4.19.0-5-amd64 x86_64
Model QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
Motherboard N/A
BIOS SeaBIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1
Processor Information
Name Intel Core i9-9900K
Topology 1 Processor, 1 Core
Identifier GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 158 Stepping 12
Base Frequency 3.60 GHz
L1 Instruction Cache 32.0 KB
L1 Data Cache 32.0 KB
L2 Cache 256 KB
L3 Cache 16.0 MB
Memory Information
Size 987 MB
Single-Core
Running AES-XTS
Running Text Compression
Running Image Compression
Running Navigation
Running HTML5
Running SQLite
Running PDF Rendering
Running Text Rendering
Running Clang
Running Camera
Running N-Body Physics
Running Rigid Body Physics
Running Gaussian Blur
Running Face Detection
Running Horizon Detection
Running Image Inpainting
Running HDR
Running Ray Tracing
Running Structure from Motion
Running Speech Recognition
Running Machine Learning
Multi-Core
Running AES-XTS
Running Text Compression
Running Image Compression
Running Navigation
Running HTML5
Running SQLite
Running PDF Rendering
Running Text Rendering
Running Clang
Running Camera
Running N-Body Physics
Running Rigid Body Physics
Running Gaussian Blur
Running Face Detection
Running Horizon Detection
Running Image Inpainting
Running HDR
Running Ray Tracing
Running Structure from Motion
Running Speech Recognition
Running Machine Learning
Uploading results to the Geekbench Browser. This could take a minute or two
depending on the speed of your internet connection.
Upload succeeded. Visit the following link and view your results online:
https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/8195003
Visit the following link and add this result to your profile:
https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/819...key=329876
Well, I think the geekbench overall score is a bit low and to be honest i have expected better than this but anyway it still better and working good for my usage.
Unix Bench:
Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use directories for:
* File I/O tests (named fs***) = /root/byte-unixbench/UnixBench/tmp
* Results = /root/byte-unixbench/UnixBench/results
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: hmrserver: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.19.0-5-amd64 -- #1 SMP Debian 4.19.37-5+deb10u2 (2019-08-08)
Machine: x86_64 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel® Core i9-9900K CPU @ 3.60GHz (7200.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
13:22:29 up 6 days, 7:54, 1 user, load average: 0.28, 0.13, 0.07; runlevel 2021-05-25
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon May 31 2021 13:22:29 - 13:50:21
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 41427578.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7348.7 MWIPS (8.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3842.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 709726.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 197164.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2013515.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1105858.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 269923.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 11223.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8289.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1073.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 729096.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 41427578.0 3549.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7348.7 1336.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 3842.3 893.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 709726.4 1792.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 197164.3 1191.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2013515.5 3471.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1105858.7 889.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 269923.9 674.8
Process Creation 126.0 11223.4 890.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8289.8 1955.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1073.3 1788.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 729096.3 486.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1322.2
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use directories for:
* File I/O tests (named fs***) = /root/byte-unixbench/UnixBench/tmp
* Results = /root/byte-unixbench/UnixBench/results
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: hmrserver: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 4.19.0-5-amd64 -- #1 SMP Debian 4.19.37-5+deb10u2 (2019-08-08)
Machine: x86_64 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel® Core i9-9900K CPU @ 3.60GHz (7200.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
13:22:29 up 6 days, 7:54, 1 user, load average: 0.28, 0.13, 0.07; runlevel 2021-05-25
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon May 31 2021 13:22:29 - 13:50:21
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 41427578.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 7348.7 MWIPS (8.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3842.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 709726.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 197164.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2013515.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1105858.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 269923.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 11223.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8289.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1073.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 729096.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 41427578.0 3549.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 7348.7 1336.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 3842.3 893.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 709726.4 1792.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 197164.3 1191.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2013515.5 3471.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1105858.7 889.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 269923.9 674.8
Process Creation 126.0 11223.4 890.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8289.8 1955.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1073.3 1788.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 729096.3 486.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1322.2
Speed Test:
Retrieving speedtest.net configuration...
Testing from Hetzner Online GmbH (xx.nx.xx.nx)...
Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
Selecting best server based on ping...
Hosted by SMSnet (Szczecin) [979.31 km]: 45.904 ms
Testing download speed................................................................................
Download: 322.16 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed................................................................................................
Upload: 322.68 Mbit/s
Testing from Hetzner Online GmbH (xx.nx.xx.nx)...
Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
Selecting best server based on ping...
Hosted by SMSnet (Szczecin) [979.31 km]: 45.904 ms
Testing download speed................................................................................
Download: 322.16 Mbit/s
Testing upload speed................................................................................................
Upload: 322.68 Mbit/s
Just to remind you all that the VPS comes with 125mbps connection but its great to see that VPS connection speed is much better than mentioned.
READ/WRITE Speeds
root@hmrserver:~# sync; dd if=/dev/zero of=tempfile bs=1M count=1024; sync
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 Gi
copied, 1.09776 s, 978 MB/s
root@hmrserver:~# dd if=tempfile of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1024
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 Gi
copied, 0.441166 s, 2.4 GB/s
root@hmrserver:~# sudo /sbin/sysctl -w vm.drop_caches=3
sudo: unable to resolve host hmrserver: Name or service not known
vm.drop_caches = 3
root@hmrserver:~# dd if=tempfile of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1024
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 Gi
copied, 0.375736 s, 2.9 GB/s
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 Gi
![Cool Cool](https://post4vps.com/images/emoji/cool.png)
root@hmrserver:~# dd if=tempfile of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1024
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 Gi
![Cool Cool](https://post4vps.com/images/emoji/cool.png)
root@hmrserver:~# sudo /sbin/sysctl -w vm.drop_caches=3
sudo: unable to resolve host hmrserver: Name or service not known
vm.drop_caches = 3
root@hmrserver:~# dd if=tempfile of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1024
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 Gi
![Cool Cool](https://post4vps.com/images/emoji/cool.png)
Well, I have provided all the benchmarks which were possible for me to provide and i guess its enough for anyone to judge the vps by these benchmarks and i will share my experience as well with VPS.
Control Panel: Yeah you heard it right and we have got a panel as well with this vps and for me their control panel is much friendly to new users than other VPSs panels even than digital ocean etc ones.
Gaming Servers: Well the VPS ram is just 1gb but the vps specifications are quite balance and i can recommend it for small gaming servers since i am hosting a small gaming aswell and it doing well.
Rating: 9/10 I didn't find much issues with this VPS since its one of the perfect i have came across in post4vps VPSs and i am quite happy with this vps.
Thanks for reading
![Jump to page](https://post4vps.com/images/arrow_down.png)
Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site. |
Search Forums |
(Advanced Search) |
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 2,271 » Latest member: orzpainter » Forum threads: 3,085 » Forum posts: 34,806 Full Statistics |
Online Users |
There are currently 330 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 328 Guest(s) Google, Bing |