arrow_upward

Poll: Do you recommend the use of Static Website Generators? If yes, which one do you recommend?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes. My choice is Jekyll
1
10.00%
Yes. My choice is Hugo
0
0%
Yes. I'm using a different one.
1
10.00%
No. I prefer the convenience of a Content Management System.
8
80.00%
Total
10 vote(s)
100%

* You voted for this item.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Do you recommend Static Website Generators - Hugo or Jekyll? Or another one?
#11
(11-21-2019, 11:52 AM)humanpuff69 Wrote: Advantage of static
-hacker proof
-faster load

Disadvantage
-harder editing . One line of edit need whole recompile

For me i still prefer dynamic one . I still use php formy website and app backend

I don’t see how a static website would be, as you describe it, “hacker proof”. Can you please elaborate on that?

And as far as I’m aware, websites aren’t like programs... you don’t compile them! Correct me if I’m wrong.
Thank you Post4VPS and VirMach for providing me with VPS9! But now it’s time to say farewell due to my studies.


Messages In This Thread
RE: Do you recommend Static Website Generators - Hugo or Jekyll? Or another one? - by ikk157 - 12-03-2019, 02:53 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread
Author
Replies
Views
Last Post
3,499
02-18-2020, 04:27 PM
Last Post: ikk157
3,553
09-19-2018, 10:42 AM
Last Post: perry

person_pin_circle Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Sponsors: VirMach - Host4Fun - CubeData - Evolution-Host - HostDare - Hyper Expert - Shadow Hosting - Bladenode - Hostlease - RackNerd - ReadyDedis - Limitless Hosting