arrow_upward

Poll: Do you recommend the use of Static Website Generators? If yes, which one do you recommend?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes. My choice is Jekyll
1
10.00%
Yes. My choice is Hugo
0
0%
Yes. I'm using a different one.
1
10.00%
No. I prefer the convenience of a Content Management System.
8
80.00%
Total
10 vote(s)
100%

* You voted for this item.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Do you recommend Static Website Generators - Hugo or Jekyll? Or another one?
#7
I have never used them directly but I have some of my friend that use it.
They told me that static website generator are very simple and easy to go on production FOR A PROJECT OF FEW PAGES, and if you need to update it you can just regenerate and overwrite all the existing files.

No maintenance required. Bare HTML and JS, good for small things but not suggested for site where you have to collect and elaborate data.
Thanks to Post4VPS and Bladenodefor VPS 14


Messages In This Thread
RE: Do you recommend Static Website Generators - Hugo or Jekyll? Or another one? - by LightDestory - 10-23-2019, 08:23 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread
Author
Replies
Views
Last Post
3,022
02-18-2020, 04:27 PM
Last Post: ikk157
3,265
09-19-2018, 10:42 AM
Last Post: perry

person_pin_circle Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Sponsors: VirMach - Host4Fun - CubeData - Evolution-Host - HostDare - Hyper Expert - Shadow Hosting - Bladenode - Hostlease - RackNerd - ReadyDedis - Limitless Hosting